نسخه متنی مقاله

تبیین الزامات پیاده‌سازی مدل کسب‌و‌کار باز در سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری

اطلاعات مقاله:
نویسندگان:
  • رضا بندريان

    عضو هيئت علمي، استاديار پژوهشي، پژوهشگاه صنعت نفت
اطلاعات تماس:
  • رضا بندريان

    Affiliation: عضو هيئت علمي، استاديار پژوهشي، پژوهشگاه صنعت نفت
    آدرس محل کار:
    تلفن محل کار:
    فکس:
    پست الکترونیک:
متن:
سرعت پیشرفتهای فناورانه سازمانهای پژوهش و فناوری را وادار به پذیرش مدلهای کسبوکار باز کرده است اما درک محدودی از اینکه سازمانهای پژوهش و فناوری چگونه میتوانند به طور موثر مدل کسبوکار خود را به سمت الگوهای بازتر تغییر دهند وجود دارد بر این اساس ابتدا ارکان مدل کسبوکار سازمانهای پژوهش و فناوری به عنوان کسبوکارهای خدماتی برای حرکت به سمت اجرای مدلهای کسبوکار باز تبیین و ابعاد اصلی مدل کسبوکار آنها شامل مفهوم فرایند منابع و زیرساختها در سازمانهای پژوهش و فناوری تشریح شده است سپس توانمندیها و فرایندهای اساسی مورد نیاز سازمانهای پژوهش و فناوری برای اجرای مدل کسبوکار باز شامل حس کردن و تصاحب فرصتها تشریح شده است
رفرانس :
  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L. and Jaakkola, E., 2012, "Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process", Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), pp.15–26.
  2. Bates, K. Bates, H. and Johnston, R., 2003, "Linking Service to Profit: the Business Case for Service Excellence", International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), pp. 173-183.
  3. Pardos, E., Gomex-Loscos, A. and Rubiera-Morollon, F., 2007, "Do versus buy’ decisions in the demand for knowledge intensive business services", The Service Industries Journal, 27 (3), pp. 233-249.
  4. Saebi, T. and Foss, N. J., 2015, "Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions", European Management Journal, 33(3), 2015, pp. 201–213.
  5. Almirall, E. and Casadesus-Masanell, R., 2010, Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence", Academy of Management Review, 35(1), pp. 27-42.
  6. Sharif, N. and Baark, E., 2011, "The Transformation of Research Technology Organizations (RTOs) in Asia and Europe",  Science, Technology & Society, 16(1), pp. 1–10.
  7. Hales, M., 2001, "Birds were dinosaurs once - The diversity and evolution of research and technology organizations". A final report of RISE: RTOs in the service economy Knowledge infrastructures, innovation intermediaries and institutional change.
  8. Brax, S., 2005, "Viewing Knowledge-Intensive Business Services as Systems", Frontiers of E-Business Research Conference, Tampere, Finland.
  9. Miles, I., 1999, "Services in National Innovation Systems: from Traditional Services to Knowledge Intensive Business Services", in Schienstock G. and Kuusi O. (eds.): Transformation Towards a Learning Economy. The Finnish National Fund for Research and Development - Sitra. Report no. 213. Helsinki.
  10. Edvardsson, B. and Olsson, J., 1996, "Key Concepts for New Service Development",  The Service Industries Journal, 16(2), pp.140-164.
  11. Edvardsson, B., 1997, "Quality in New Service Development: Key Concepts and Frame of Reference", International Journal of Production Economics, 52, pp. 31-46.
  12. Miles, I., 2005, "Knowledge intensive business services: prospects and policies", Foresight, 7(6), pp. 39-63.
  13. Miles, I., Kastrinos, N., Flanagan, K., Bilderbeek, R., Den Hertog, P., Hutink, W. and Bouman, M., 1995, "Knowledge intensive business services: their roles as users, carriers and sources of innovation", PREST, Manchester.
  1. بندريان، رضا. كريمي دستجردي، داود.، جعفرنژاد، احمد.، 1391، «الگوي مديريت راهبردي توسعه فناوري در سازمان‌هاي پژوهش و فناوري در صنعت نفت: موردي از پژوهش آميخته»، سياست علم و فناوري، 4 (3)، صص 39-56.
  1. Barney, J. B. and Mackey, T. B., 2005, "Testing resource-based theory", Research methodology in strategy and management, 2, pp. 1-13.
  2. Ketchen, D.J. and Hult, G.T.M., 2007,  "Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: The case of best value supply chains", Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), pp. 573-580.
  3. Ridder A. K., 2011, "Sensing and seizing open innovation: a capability-based approach", DIME-DRUID ACADEMY Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
  4. Muller, E. and Zenker, A., 2001, "Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems", Research Policy, 30(9), pp. 1501–1516.
  5. Lichtenthaler, U. and Lichtenthaler, E., 2009, "A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity", Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), pp. 1315-1338.
  6. Szulanski, G., 1996, "Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice with in the firm", Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 27-43.
  7. Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., 1997, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533.
  8. Marsh, S. J. and Stock, G. N., 2006, "Creating dynamic capability: The role of intertemporal integration, knowledge retention, and interpretation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(5), pp. 422-426.
  9. Birkinshaw, J. and Monteiro, F., 2007, "External knowledge sourcing: Uncovering the technology scouting process", AIM Research Working Paper Series, 1744-0009.
  10. Lichtenthaler, U., 2008, "Externally commercializing technology assets: An examination of different process stages", Journal of Business Venturing, 23, pp. 445-464.
  11. Zahra, S. A., Van de Velde, E. and Larraneta, B., 2007, "Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs", Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), pp. 569-608.
  12. Lichtenthaler, U. and Ernst, H., 2006, Attitudes to externally organising knowledge management tasks: a review, reconsideration and extension of the NIH syndrome", R&D Management, 36(4), pp. 367-386.
  13. Christensen, C.M., Anthony, S.D., Berstell, G. and Nitterhouse, D., 2007, "Finding the right job for your product", MIT Sloan Management Review, 48, pp. 38-47.
  14. Martin, X. and Salomon, R., 2003, "Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation", Journal of International Business Studies, 34, pp. 356-373.
  15. Lichtenthaler, U., 2010, Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the righ ‘job’ for your technology, Technovation, 30, pp. 429-435.
  16. Katz, R., & Allen, T.J., 1982, "Investigating the Not-Invented-Here (NIH) Syndrome: A look at the performance tenure and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups", R&D Management, 12(1), pp. 7-19.
  17. Harrison, J.S., Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Ireland, R.D., 2001, "Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances", Journal of Management, 27, pp. 679-690.
  18. Leitner, K-H., 2005, "Managing and Reporting Intangible Assets in Research Technology Organizations", R&D Management, 35 (2), pp. 125-136.
  19. Van der Meer, H., 2007, "Open innovation – The Dutch treat: Challenges in thinking in business models", Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(2), pp. 192-202.
  20. Chesbrough, H.W., 2003, "Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology", Boston, M.A.: Harvard Business School Press.
  21. Ambrosini, V. and Bowman, C., 2009, "What are dynamic capabilities and are they useful constructs in strategic management? ", International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (1), pp. 29-49.
  22. Teece, D.J., 2007, "Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance", Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13), pp. 1319-1350.