اهمیت ترویج علم درکاهش شبه علم دردوران کووید 19

نویسندگان

1 دانشیارمرکز تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور

2 دانشجوی دکتری علوم ارتباطات اجتماعی

چکیده

ترویج علم دربردارندة طیف وسیعی از فعالیت‌ها از جمله پذیرش، درک و مشارکت همگان در علم است که هدف مشترک تمامی آنها کاستن فاصله میان علم و عموم مردم است. هدف این مقاله بررسی اهمیت ترویج علم در کاهش شبه علم در دوران کووید 19 است.
در این مقاله از روش مطالعه اسنادی استفاده شده است. با شیوع همه‌گیری کووید 19 در جهان، بیش از گذشته اهمیت علم و ترویج آن در نزد جهانیان به منظور کاهش شبه علم افزایش یافته است. در این دوران بار دیگر، بشر برای کشف واکسن کرونا، به علم، دانشمندان و متخصصان چشم امید بست. با توجه به اینکه، یکی از اهداف مهم ترویج علم مبارزه با خرافات و شبه علم1 است، تفکر انتقادی یکی از ابزارهای مبارزه با شبه علم محسوب می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

dor 20.1001.1.10272690.1399.30.79.2.9

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Importance of popularization of Science in the Decline Pseudo-Science in The Covid 19 Era

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akram Ghadimi 1
  • Bahareh Safavi 2
1 Associate Professor NRISP
2 Phd student of Social Communication Sciences
چکیده [English]

The popularization of science involves a broad range of activities, including the acceptance, understanding and participation in science that common goal it of bridging the gap between science and the general public. The aim of this paper is to investigate the importance of popularization of science in reducing pseudo-science in the Covid 19 period. In this paper, the method of documentary research has been used. With the prevalence of Covid 19 in the world, the importance of science and its popularization in the world to reduce pseudo-science has increased more than ever. Once again, humans relied on science, scientists, and experts to discover the corona vaccine. Considering that, one of the important goals of popularization of science is to fight against superstition and pseudoscience, critical thinking is one of the tools to combat pseudoscience.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Science
  • Science Popularization
  • Pseudo-science
  • Critical Thinking
[1]    Ghadimi, A. (1398). Designing a model for popularization of science, research project, Tehran: nrisp.
[2]    Paya, A. (1387). Public Understanding of Science: A Philosophical Appraisal, Quarterly Journal of Science and Technology Policy, Spring 2008, No. 1.
[3]    Ren, F. & Zhai, J. (2014). Communication and Popularization of Science and Technology in China. China Science and Technology Press and Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
[4]    Ghani Rad, M. ا. And Morshedi, A. (1390). Survey of general understanding of science and technology: A case study of Tehran citizens. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, Third Year, Issue 3, Spring 2011.
[5]    Sheikh Jabbari, M. And Stove, S. (1391). The structure of science and society relations in Iran: promotion of science. Nasha Alam Magazine, second year, second issue, June 2012.
[6]    Ghadimi, A. (1396). Popularization of science; Methods, indicators and case studies, Tehran: Scientific Policy Research Center.
[7]    Vahidi, M. (1388). Science in society. Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies.
[8]    Sismondo, S. (1392). Introduction to science and technology studies. Translated by Yasser Khoshnovis. Tehran: Soroush Publications.
[9]    Derry, G.N. (1999). "What science is and how it works", First edition, Princeton university press, New Jersey, pp. 3-4.
[10]    Communicating and Popularizing Science. (1999). World Conference on Science, UNESCO, Budapest, 26 June- 1 July 1999.
[11]  Coker, R. (2001)."Distinguishing science and pseudoscience" at http://www.quackwatch. com/01Quackery
RelatedTopics/ pseudo.html
[12]    Afonso, A. S. Gilbert, J. K. (2010). "Pseudoscience: A meaningful context for assessing nature of science", International Journal of Science Education, 32 (3), 329-348.
[13]    Singer B, Benassi VA (January–February 1981). "Occult beliefs: Media distortions, social uncertainty, and deficiencies of human reasoning seem to be at the basis of occult beliefs". American Scientist. 69 (1): 49–55. JSTOR 27850247.
[14]    Popper, K. (2005). "The Logic of Scientific Discovery", first published, Routledge, New York, pp.17-20.
[15]    Kazemi, F., Saburi, A.A. (1394). Pseudo-science, Nasha-e-Alam magazine, sixth year, first issue, January 1994.
[16]    Pseudoscientific". Oxford American Dictionary. Oxford English Dictionary. Pseudoscientific – pretending to be scientific, falsely represented as being scientific.
[17]    Qasemi, F. The deadliest pandemics in history; Published in Khorasan newspaper, July 2016. In the following link. http://www.khorasannews.com/newspaper/page/20421/1/700973/0
[18]    Stanovich, K. E. (2013). "How to Think Straight about Psychology",. Tenth edition, HarperCollins Publishers, Toronto, p. 21.
[23]    https://www.asriran.com/fa/news/723672/
[25]    https://www.isna.ir/news/99101309441/
[26]    Spaan, J. A. (2010). "The danger of pseudoscience in Informetrics", Journal of Informetrics, 4 (3), 439-440.
[27]    Adam, A. Manson T. M. (2014). "Using a pseudoscienceactivity to teach critical thinking", Society for the Teaching of Psychology, 41 (2), 130-134.