عنوان مقاله [English]
Over the past three decades of research, despite the success of scientific quantitative production, their quality has not improved in terms of developing the knowledge boundaries and the effectiveness of research results in the country's development indicators. As the article production increased, why did not pay attention to the quality of articles? And simultaneously, why the value of the effectiveness of produced science on the society did not take into consideration? These questions and the other ones of this kind are the cases that the writers will review. In the meantime, whether the country's past research can be criticized, or whether it can be violated, and whether in the three decades of research the country has been affected by the effectiveness of scientific production in the development of the country and the system of research management in the country. The purpose of this research is to investigate the three decades of research in the country, to examine two different perspectives from discourse of the day in the field of research and pathology of the field of research, and finally to present various strategies that can pave the way. It is obvious that the general survey of quantitative and qualitative paradigms shows that Iran's research in extending the knowledge boundaries has little effect on the development of society. Therefore, the existing capacities of research of the country create the expectation that along with increasing the financial support for research, while maintaining the growth of scientific papers numbers, the research system of the country will be managed in a way that will contribute to the quality of the articles as well as to promote the development indicators of society that it’s buds have grown over the last few years. Creating the required structures for technology and commercialization of research has provided the appropriate fields to change the paradigm and the research management system of the country. A deeper analysis of this issue will require more extensive applied research from both the views and attitudes of the top executives of the research system of the country and the researchers' attitudes.