در جستجوی الگوی تجاریسازی پژوهشهای دانشگاهی با کاربست فراترکیب

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته علوم تربیتی گرایش مدیریت آموزش عالی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

2 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

Bolisani E, Bratianu C. The emergence of knowledge management. InEmergent knowledge strategies 2018 (pp. 23-47). Springer, Cham.
Namdarian L, Naimi-Sadigh A. Towards an understanding of the commercialization drivers of research findings in Iran. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2018 Jul 1;10 (4): 389-99.
Perkmann M, Walsh K. The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2009 Dec 1;18 (6): 1033-65.
Abreu, M., Grinevich, V. Hughes, A., Kitson, M. Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors, Centre for Business Research and UK∼IRC, University of Cambridge. 2009.
عباسی اسفنجانی، حسین. طراحی الگوی تجاری‌سازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی با روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری حداقل مربعات جزئی. پژوهشنامه بازرگانی. 1-21. 21 (82)، 1396.
علی احمدی، علیرضا، فروزنده، لطف‌ا...، عباسی اسفنجانی، حسین. شناسایی ابزارهای حمایتی دولت‌ها برای تجاری‌سازی تحقیقات دانشگاهی. رهیافت، 47 (20). 1389.
Chang, Y. C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M. H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38 (6), 936-946.
ندیرخانلو، سمیرا. تجاری‌سازی علم در ایران: ملاحظات انتقادی. رهیافت، 26 (64). 1395.
Rasmussen E, Moen Ø, Gulbrandsen M. Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation. 2006 Apr 1; 26 (4): 518-33.
Etzkowitz H. Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy. 2003 Jan 1; 32 (1): 109-21.
Slaughter S, Leslie LL. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1997
Henrekson M, Rosenberg N. Incentives for academic entrepreneurship and economic performance: Sweden and the United States. IUI Working Paper; 2000.
Debackere K, Veugelers R. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research policy. 2005 Apr 1; 34 (3): 321-42.
Murray F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Research policy. 2004 May 1; 33 (4): 643-59.
Siegel DS, Veugelers R, Wright M. Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy. 2007 Dec 1; 23 (4): 640-60.
McDougall G, Roberts A. Commercializing Air Traffic Control: have the reforms worked? Canadian Public Administration. 2008 Mar; 51 (1): 45-69.
Gans J, Stern S. Managing ideas: Commercialization strategies for biotechnology. Melbourne: Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne; 2002 Feb.
Greis NP. Technology adoption, product design, and process change: a case study in the machine tool industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1995 Aug; 42 (3): 192-202.
Katila R, Mang PY. Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations. Research policy. 2003 Feb 1; 32 (2): 317-32.
Shan W, Visudtibhan K. Cooperative strategy in commercializing an emerging technology. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990 Jul 25; 47 (2): 172-81.
Pisano, G., Shan, W., Teece, D., 1988. Joint ventures and collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In: Mowery, D. (Ed.), International Collaborative Ventures in US Manufacturing. Ballinger Press, Cambridge, MA.
Liebeskind JP, Argyres NS. Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology. Available at SSRN 10041. 1996.
Monteverde K, Teece DJ. Vertical integration and supplier switching costs. Bell Journal of Economics. 1982; 13 (1): 206-13.
Das TK, Teng BS. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of management. 2000 Jan 1; 26 (1): 31-61.
Osborn RN, Baughn CC. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Academy of Management journal. 1990 Sep 1; 33 (3): 503-19.
Dutta S, Narasimhan O, Rajiv S. Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical?. Marketing science. 1999 Nov; 18 (4): 547-68.
Oxley JE. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 1997 Oct 1; 13 (2): 387-409.
عسگری، امیر، خورسندی ‌طاسکوه، علی، غیاثی‌ندوشن، سعید، قاضی‌نوری، سیّد سروش و محمّدصادق خیاطیان‌یزدی. «بیان ماهیت و ارائه مدل استقرار ناحیه نوآوری: پژوهشی فراترکیب با استفاده از متن‌کاوی»، شماره 81، 20 صص 21-41. 1400.
Khan MS. Q & A. Are Universities Ready for Knowledge Commercialization?. Technology Innovation Management Review. 2017; 7 (7).
Alipour, AR & Enayati T, Fourth Generation Universities Research Commercialization. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 2017; 26 (26): 53-76.
Coffman WR, Lesser WH, McCouch SR. Commercialization and the scientific research process: The example of plant breeding. Science and the University. 2003 May 20.
Lowe J. Commercialization of university research: a policy perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1993 Jan 1; 5 (1): 27-37.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

In search of the model of commercialization of university researches with metasynthesis application

نویسندگان [English]

  • zahra namvararabani 1
  • abbas abbaspour 2
1 PhD student in Educational Sciences, majoring in Higher Education Management, Allameh Tabatabai University
2 Faculty member of Allameh Tabatabai University
چکیده [English]

Commercialization of research has been widely spread in recent decades as a new approach in academic research. Commercialization of university researches is the most important responsibility of universities in linking universities with industry and sustainable development. One of the main reasons for comprehensive development in developed countries is the attention to the commercialization of research and innovative ideas in the field of technology. The purpose of this research is to design a model of academic research commercialization based on previous studies, considering the important role of academic research commercialization in the development of the industry and economy of each society.. The present article tries to systematically review the findings of studies in this regard using the meta-combined method. In this study, the seven-step model, Barroso and Sandlowski (2007) is used and based on the formation process and output achievement, to analyze They pay. For this purpose, by referring to the valid documents available on the electronic sites, 57 articles were reviewed and finally 23 articles were approved and the categories extracted in the form of a model with four components: Research, development and market entry, functions and decisions were identified. The validity of the analysis was assessed using the kappa coefficient, which was equal to 0.78. The results showed that since the models studied in the research sources section, almost all of them have been presented by the authors for commercialization in the private sector as well as product development, The main pattern of commercialization is divided into four parts: research, functions, decisions, and development and market entry.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • commercialization
  • academic research
  • application of commercialization
  • Linking the university with the industry
  • meta-synthesis

مراجع

]Bolisani E, Bratianu C. The emergence of knowledge management. InEmergent knowledge strategies 2018 (pp. 23-47). Springer, Cham.
[2]  Namdarian L, Naimi-Sadigh A. Towards an understanding of the commercialization drivers of research findings in Iran. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 2018 Jul 1;10(4):389-99.
 
[3] Perkmann M, Walsh K. The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2009 Dec 1;18(6):1033-65.
[4] Abreu, M., Grinevich, V. Hughes, A., Kitson, M. Knowledge Exchange between Academics and the Business, Public and Third Sectors, Centre for Business Research and UK∼IRC, University of Cambridge. 2009.
 [5] Abasi, H. Designing the Model for Commercialization of University Research Using Structural Equation Modeling- Partial Least Squares Method (SEM-PLS). Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 21(82): 1-21. 2017.
[6] Yadollahi Farsi, J., Kalathai, Z. The place of commercialization in innovation management and major introduction of commercialization models in the field of advanced industries. 9 (33), 2011.
[7] Hashem Nia, S., Emadzadeh, M., Samadi; S., Sakti, P,. Commercialization methods in higher education and its challenges. Iran's higher education. 2 (2009), 35-57. 2009.
[8] Cano Cano, EL., BB. Fuster, et al. "Valorization and commercialization companies in the knowledge to market process of higher education organizations applying science-to-business marketing methods."  2: 630-637.2010.
[9] Ali Ahmadi, A., Foruzandeh, L. A., Abbasi Sphinzhani, H., Identifying government support tools for academic research commercialization. Rahyaft, 47 (20). 2010.
[10] Chang, Y. C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M. H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38(6), 936-946.
[11] Nadir Khanlou, S., Commercialization of science in Iran: critical considerations. Rahyaft, 26 (64). 2015.
 
[12] Rasmussen E, Moen Ø, Gulbrandsen M. Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation. 2006 Apr 1;26(4):518-33.
[13] Etzkowitz H. Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research policy. 2003 Jan 1;32(1):109-21.
[14] Slaughter S, Leslie LL. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1997
[15] Henrekson M, Rosenberg N. Incentives for academic entrepreneurship and economic performance: Sweden and the United States. IUI Working Paper; 2000.
[16] Debackere K, Veugelers R. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry science links. Research policy. 2005 Apr 1;34(3):321-42.
[17] Murray F. The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life. Research policy. 2004 May 1;33(4):643-59.
[18]Siegel DS, Veugelers R, Wright M. Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy. 2007 Dec 1;23(4):640-60.
[19] McDougall G, Roberts A. Commercializing Air Traffic Control: have the reforms worked?. Canadian Public Administration. 2008 Mar;51(1):45-69.
[20] Gans J, Stern S. Managing ideas: Commercialization strategies for biotechnology. Melbourne: Melbourne Business School, University of Melbourne; 2002 Feb.
[21] Greis NP. Technology adoption, product design, and process change: a case study in the machine tool industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 1995 Aug;42(3):192-202.
[22] Katila R, Mang PY. Exploiting technological opportunities: the timing of collaborations. Research policy. 2003 Feb 1;32(2):317-32.
[23] Shan W, Visudtibhan K. Cooperative strategy in commercializing an emerging technology. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990 Jul 25;47(2):172-81.
 [24]Pisano, G., Shan, W., Teece, D., 1988. Joint ventures and collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In: Mowery, D. (Ed.), International Collaborative Ventures in US Manufacturing. Ballinger Press, Cambridge, MA.
[25] Liebeskind JP, Argyres NS. Privatizing the Intellectual Commons: Universities and the Commercialization of Biotechnology. Available at SSRN 10041. 1996.
[26] Monteverde K, Teece DJ. Vertical integration and supplier switching costs. Bell Journal of Economics. 1982;13(1):206-13.
[27] Das TK, Teng BS. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of management. 2000 Jan 1;26(1):31-61.
[28] Osborn RN, Baughn CC. Forms of interorganizational governance for multinational alliances. Academy of Management journal. 1990 Sep 1;33(3):503-19.
[29] Dutta S, Narasimhan O, Rajiv S. Success in high-technology markets: Is marketing capability critical?. Marketing science. 1999 Nov;18(4):547-68.
[30] Oxley JE. Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: A transaction cost approach. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 1997 Oct 1;13(2):387-409.
[31] Sandelowski M, Barroso J, Voils CI. Using qualitative metasummary to synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings. Research in nursing & health. 2007 Feb;30(1):99-111.
[32] Asgari, A., Khorsandi-Taskoh, A., Ghiathindoshan, S., Ghazinouri, S. S., Khayatian-Yazdi, M. "Statement of the nature and presentation of the establishment model of the innovation area: a meta-composite research using text mining"Rahyaft., No. 81, 20 pp. 21-41. 2021.
 [33] Khan MS. Q&A. Are Universities Ready for Knowledge Commercialization?. Technology Innovation Management Review. 2017;7(7).
 [34] Alipour, AR & Enayati T,. Fourth Generation Universities Research Commercialization. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 2017; 26(26): 53-76.
[35] Coffman WR, Lesser WH, McCouch SR. Commercialization and the scientific research process: The example of plant breeding. Science and the University. 2003 May 20.
 [36]Lowe J. Commercialization of university research: a policy perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 1993 Jan 1;5(1):27-37.
[37] Caulfield T, Ogbogu U. The commercialization of university-based research: Balancing risks and benefits. BMC medical ethics. 2015 Dec;16(1):1-7.
[38] Wu W. Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities. The journal of technology transfer. 2010 Apr;35(2):203-24.
[39] Rasmussen E, Moen Ø, Gulbrandsen M. Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation. 2006 Apr 1;26(4):518-33.
[40] Zhao F. Commercialization of research: a case study of Australian universities. Higher Education Research & Development. 2004 May 1;23(2):223-36.
[41] Yencken J, Gillin M. A longitudinal comparative study of university research commercialization performance: Australia, UK and USA. Innovation. 2006 Oct 1;8(3):214-27.
[42] Tanha D, Salamzadeh A, Allahian Z, Salamzadeh Y. Commercialization of university research and innovations in Iran: obstacles and solutions. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology. 2011 Dec 1;1(7):126-46.
[43] Meigounpoory MR, Ahmadi B. Identification of the factors that affect in choosing the university research commercialization strategies. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences. 2012;12(1):140-7.
[44] Leisyte L. University commercialization policies and their implementation in the Netherlands and the United States. Science and public policy. 2011 Jul 1;38(6):437-48.
[45] Ravi R, Janodia MD. Factors affecting technology transfer and commercialization of university research in India: A cross-sectional study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2022 Mar;13(1):787-803.
[46] Belitski M, Aginskaja A, Marozau R. Commercializing university research in transition economies: Technology transfer offices or direct industrial funding?. Research policy. 2019 Apr 1;48(3):601-15.
[47] Abbas A, Avdic A, Xiaobao P, Hasan MM, Ming W. University-government collaboration for the generation and commercialization of new knowledge for use in industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2019 Jan 1;4(1):23-31.
[48] Chatterjee D, Leisyte L, Dasappa S, Sankaran B. University research commercialization in emerging economies: a glimpse into the ‘black box’. Science and Public Policy. 2018 Jun 1;45(3):361-72.
[49] Ismail N, Aziz NA, Hartono A. Instrument Development to Review Factors for Research Commercialization Study in Universities. InSHS Web of Conferences 2021 (Vol. 124, p. 05002). EDP Sciences.
[50] Myers A. Commercialization strategies for a university research project: putting theory into practice. Lappeenranta–Lahti University of Technology LUT Master’s Programme in International Business and Entrepreneurship, Master’s Thesis, 2021.
[51] Beyadar, H., Saketi, P., Badizadeh, A., Esmailpour, H. Identifying and Prioritizing Barriers to the Commercialization of Academic Research: A Contextual Analysis in Islamic Azad University. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 2021; 4(1): 1096-1109.
[52] Khademi T, Ismail K. Commercialization success factors of university research output. Sains Humanika. 2013 Aug 15;64(3).
 
[53] Wright M, Phan P. The commercialization of science: From determinants to impact. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2018 Feb;32(1):1-3.
[54] Suhaimi NS, Halim MA, Hashim HA. Commercialization of academic research: assessing the perception of academicians at a public university in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 2020 Dec 29.
 
[55] Perkmann M, Tartari V, McKelvey M, Autio E, Broström A, D’este P, Fini R, Geuna A, Grimaldi R, Hughes A, Krabel S. Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research policy. 2013 Mar 1;42(2):423-42.
[56] Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications; 2018 May 9.
[57]  Narimani A R, Vaezi R, Alvani S M, Ghorbanizadeh V. Identifying External Organizational Barriers and Factors of Commercialization of Humanities Research at Universities. JMDP; 30 (1) :81-110.2017.
 [58]  Hosseiniyanpouya, H., Ghazinoori, S., Goodarzi, M. Identifying factors affecting Technology Commercialization Strategy based on the Meta-Synthesis method. Journal of Technology Development Management. 3(2): 63-97. 2015.
 [59]  Narimani, A. R., vaezi, R. Identify factors to the commercialization of research in Knowledge of public administration. Journal of Public Administration. 9(2): 235-262. 2017.

فایل ها

همرسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار