بررسی عوامل اجتماعی- اقتصادی مرتبط با انتشار اسناد علمی در کشورهای با درامد میانه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکترای تخصصی جامعه‌شناسی اقتصاد و توسعه، دانشجوی کارشناسی ‌ارشد پژوهش علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری

2 استادیار جمعیت‌شناسی، دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری

3 استادیار اقتصاد، دانشگاه حکیم سبزواری

چکیده

هدف مقاله حاضر بررسی تأثیر عوامل اقتصادی و اجتماعی بر انتشار اسناد علمی است. مقدار انتشار اسناد علمی می‌تواند افزایش یا کاهش یابد؛ زیرا انتشار اسناد علمی تحت تأثیر بسیاری از عوامل اقتصادی، جامعه‌شناختی، فرهنگی و سیاسی است. بدین ترتیب پژوهش پیش‌رو نحوه تأثیر عوامل اجتماعی-اقتصادی بر انتشار اسناد علمی کشورهای با درآمد میانه را مورد بررسی قرار می‌دهد. آمارهای مربوط به انتشار اسناد علمی، دسترسی به اطلاعات و ارتباطات، دسترسی برابر به آموزش با کیفیت، دانشگاه‌های با کیفیت، هزینه‌های دولت برای آموزش، سهم ارزش افزوده بخش صنعت، تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه و متغیرهای کنترل شامل امید به زندگی و جمعیت در 56 کشور برگرفته از مؤسسات سایمگو، شاخص پیشرفت اجتماعی و بانک جهانی در طی سال‌های 2011 تا 2021 می‌باشد. جهت بررسی تأثیر متغیرهای مذکور بر انتشار اسناد علمی از روش داده‌های تابلویی استفاده و با نرم‌افزار Eviews12 مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفته است. نتایج برآورد داده‌های تابلویی در سال‌های مورد بررسی نشان داد که تأثیر عوامل اجتماعی (دسترسی به اطلاعات و ارتباطات، دستیابی برابر به آموزش باکیفیت، دانشگاه‌های با کیفیت)؛ و عوامل اقتصادی (هزینه‌های دولت برای هر آموزشی، سهم ارزش افزوده بخش صنعت، تولید ناخالص داخلی سرانه) بر انتشار اسناد علمی در کشورهای با درآمد میانه، افزایشی و معنی‌دار است. همین‌طور، عوامل اجتماعی نسبت به عوامل اقتصادی تأثیر بیشتری بر انتشار اسناد علمی؛ و از بین عوامل اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دسترسی برابر به آموزش باکیفیت تأثیر بیشتری بر انتشار اسناد علمی دارد. بنابراین، از آنجایی که انتشار اسناد علمی از عوامل اجتماعی-اقتصادی تأثیرپذیری دارد، برای تداوم و رشد علم لازم است به عوامل اجتماعی و اقتصادی توجه کرد. جهت رشد این عوامل، محققان، جامعه‌شناسان و اقتصاددانان باید با همفکری یکدیگر برنامه‌ریزی‌هایی را انجام دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating socio-economic factors related to the publication of scientific documents in middle-income countries

نویسندگان [English]

  • hoda rezaei roshan 1
  • Shafieh Ghodrati 2
  • Seyed Ehsan Alavi 3
1 Specialized doctorate in economics and development sociology; and a master's student in social science research at Hakim Sabzevari University
2 Assistant Professor of Demographics at Hakim Sabzevari University
3 Assistant Professor of Economics at Hakim Sabzevari University
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this article is to investigate the effect of economic and social factors on the publication of scientific documents. The amount of publication of scientific documents can increase or decrease; Because the publication of scientific documents is influenced by many economic, sociological, cultural and political factors. In fact, scientific literature includes various works that show that the publication of scientific documents is influenced by institutional conditions, cultural dimensions, knowledge management processes, barriers to access to information, technical and human capital, such as databases, scientific resources, software licenses, laboratories, materials in favorable conditions and personnel dedicated to research and development, etc. Evaluating the publication of scientific documents in terms of quantity, through databases indexing publication data from scientific journals that respond to quality standards that are acceptable by the members of the scientific community itself. The inequality in the production of countries is an important fact that highlights the difference in the resources that are devoted to the scientific research activities of each country. In this way, the upcoming research examines the influence of socio-economic factors on the publication of scientific documents in middle-income countries. Statistics related to the publication of scientific documents, access to information and communication, equal access to quality education, quality weighted universities, government expenditure on education, share of value added of the industry sector, GDP per capita and control variables including life expectancy and population in 56 The country is derived from Scimago institutions, the social progress index and the World Bank during the years 2011 to 2021. Considering that the World Bank has divided countries into high-income countries, countries with upper middle income, countries with lower middle income, and low-income countries. In the present study, middle-income countries (countries with lower middle income and upper middle income) are selected and from these countries, according to the maximum available data, countries are selected. This study is quantitative and applied. In this research, firstly, using the library and documentation method, statistics and information, the theoretical and experimental bases of the research are collected, then the collected data is processed using descriptive and analytical statistics. Finally, using theoretical and experimental foundations, statistical models and the econometric analysis method of Levin, Lin and Chou, F Limer, Hausman, Breusch–Pagan test, LR variance heterogeneity, autocorrelation and fixed effects tests to investigate the effect of the mentioned variables on the publication of scientific documents, the panel data method has been used and analyzed with Eviews12 software. The current research aims to identify social and economic factors, to determine the impact of social factors (access to information and communication (Bland & Ruffin, 1992), equal access to quality education (Bland & Ruffin, 1992), quality weighted universities (Bland & Ruffin, 1992), ) as well as the impact of economic factors (government expenditure on education (Lancho-Barrantes and Cantu-Ortiz, 2020), the share of the value added of the industry sector (Mozafari et al., 2011), GDP per capita (Guo et al., 2021) to along with life expectancy at 60 years (Bland & Ruffin, 1992) and population (Guo et al., 2021) as control variables in middle-income countries. So that it can be a source for knowing the practical skills of people's healthy social life level and making them efficient and increasing their capabilities in the academic, educational and industrial society, to promote the publication of scientific documents and increase their efficiency and optimal use. The results of panel data estimation in the years under review showed that the influence of social factors (access to information and communication, equal access to quality education, quality weighted universities); And economic factors (government expenditure on education, contribution of the value added of the industry sector, GDP per capita) on the publication of scientific documents in middle-income countries are incremental and significant. Likewise, social factors have a greater impact on the publication of scientific documents than economic factors; And among the social and economic factors, equal access to quality education has a greater impact on the publication of scientific documents. Therefore, since the publication of scientific documents is influenced by socio-economic factors, for publishing high scientific documents, all socio-economic indicators should be taken into account. In order to grow these factors, researchers, sociologists and economists must plan together. In the age of industrialization, the economy without science and science without economy will have no fate but backwardness. Until the socio-economic status of the society reaches a desirable level, socio-economic developments will not have much effect on the publication of scientific documents. If socio-economic factors exceed a desired level, suddenly the socio-economic profitability of the scientific sector will increase and scientific investments will be accompanied by the explosive growth of science. However, scientific growth does not necessarily lead to the growth of production and industry. Because knowledge is efficient if it can be provided to technology in the form of innovation so that it can pass the production stage and enter the industrial stage

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social factors
  • Economic factors
  • Publication of scientific documents
  • Middle-income
  • Panel data
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4), 1016-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.09.007
Altbach, P. G. (2015). What counts for academic productivity in research universities? International Higher Education, (79), 6-7. DOI: 10.6017/ihe.2015.79.5837
Aydin, O. T. (2017). Research performance of higher education institutions: A review on the measurements and affecting factors of research performance. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 7 (2), 312-20.
Braun, T., Gla¨nzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1988). The newest version of the facts and figures on publication output and relative citation impact of 100 countries, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 14, 365-82.
Castells, M., & Martin, I. (2005). Conversations with Manuel Castells (H., Chavoshian, & L., Javafshani; Persian Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (Persian)
Chang, O. H., & Chow, C. W. (1998). Publishing in internationally respected accounting journals: Insights and suggestions of successful Chinese authors. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting, 5 (1), 150-65. DOI: 10.1080/10293574.1998.10510534
Cole, S., & Phelan, T. (1999). The scientific productivity of nations. Minerva, 37 (1), 1–23.
e Costa, C. A. B., & Oliveira, M. D. (2012). A multicriteria decision analysis model for faculty evaluation. Omega, 40 (4), 424-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2011.08.006
Drori, G. S. (1993). The relationship between science, technology and the economy in lesser developed countries. Social Studies of Science, 23 (1), 201-15. DOI: 10.1177/030631293023001007
Drori, G. S. (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Californi: Stanford University Press.
Gantman, E. R. (2012). Economic, linguistic, and political factors in the scientific productivity of countries. Scientometrics, 93 (3), 967-85. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0736-3
Ghazipour, F. (2002). Normative and organizational factors affecting the amount of scientific production of faculty members (M.A. thesis). Tehran: Al-Zahra University, Faculty of Social Sciences. (Persian)
Guo, W., Zhou, Z., Liang, Y., Xu, C., Zeng, L., Dong, Z., & Mu, R. (2021). Effects of socio-economic factors on research over systemic sclerosis: An analysis based on long time series of bibliometric data. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 16, 1-10.
Hassanzadeh, M., Nasser, N., Zandian, F. (2020). Scientific on factors economic impact Iran in development. Journal Research Scientometrics, 6 (2), 60-78. (Persian) DOI: 2.4339.2019.rsci/22070.10
Hejazi, Y., & Behravan, ZH. (2009). The relationship between individual and institutional factors and research productivity of agricultural faculty members in the case of Agricultural faculties of Tehran province. Iranian Agricultural Extension and Education Journal, 5 (1), 47-60. (Persian)
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102 (46), 16569-72. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102
The World Bank. (2022). Indicators. Retrieved 2023, September, 18, from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
https://www.scimagojr.com/
Inönü, E. (2003). The influence of cultural factors on scientific production. Scientometrics, 56 (1), 137-46. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021906925642
Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Ceballos, H. G., & Cantú-Ortiz, F. J. (2019). Factors that influence scientific productivity from different countries: A causal approach through multiple regression using panel data. bioRxiv, 558254. DOI:10.1101/558254
Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., & Cantu-Ortiz, F. J. (2020). Measuring the incidence of social factors on scientific research: A socio-scientometrics analysis of strategic countries. Investigación Bibliotecológica, 34 (85), 61-80. DOI: 10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2020.85.58211
Mozafari, F. A., Padashi Asl, Kh., Shamsi, L., & Boudaghi, A. (2011). The evaluation of role and status of interdisciplinary in relationship of university - industry. Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4 (1), 25-40. (Persian) DOI: 10.7508/isih.2012.13.002
Nafukho, F. M., Wekullo, C. S., & Muyia, M. H. (2019). Examining research productivity of faculty in selected leading public universities in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development, 66, 44-51.
Purkayatha, P. (2004 december 12). Scientific Capability and the Wealth of Nations. Delhi Science Forum. Retrieved 2023 September 18 from: https://delhiscienceforum.net/scientific-capability-and-the-wealth-of-nations-by-prabir-purkayastha/
Qanei Rad, M. A. (2006). Interactions and communications in the scientific community: A case study of the field of social sciences. Tehran: Research Institute of Cultural and Social Studies. (Persian)
Quy, N.H. (2015). Factors influencing the research productivity of academics at the research-oriented university in Vietnam (Ph. D. Dissertation). Mount Gravatt, Australia, Griffith University.
Sagasti, F., & Alcalde, G. (1999). Development cooperation in a fractured global order: An arduous transition. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.
Schofer, E., Ramı´rez, F., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The effects of science on national economic development, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 65 (6), 866-87.
Segal, A. (1996). why does the Muslim world lag in science? Middle East Quarterly, 3 (2), 1-12.
Shenhav, Y., & Kamens, D. (1991). The ‘costs’ of institutional isomorphism in non-western countries. Social Studies of Science, 21 (3), 427-545.
Tekneci, P. D. (2014). Evaluating research performance of Turkish Universities (Ph. D. Dissertation). Ankara, Middle East Technical University.
White, C. S., James, K., Burke, L. A., Allen, R.S. (2012). What makes a “research star”? Factors influencing the research productivity of business faculty. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61 (6), 584-602.