Identifying and explaining the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in science and technology policymaking based on collaborative policy networks

Document Type : Research paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor, School of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University

2 Master's student in Business Administration-Marketing, Fatemiyeh Shiraz Institute of Higher Education

Abstract

The developments resulting from the development of artificial intelligence have fundamentally transformed the landscape of science and technology policymaking and enabled the formation of new models of network governance. In the meantime, collaborative policy networks, as one of the new approaches to policy-making, emphasize the interaction, cooperation, and collaboration of governmental and non-governmental actors. The aim of the present study is to identify the implications of artificial intelligence in science and technology policymaking based on collaborative policy networks. This study is applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of method and is based on the thematic analysis strategy. The research data were collected through semi-structured interviews with experts in the field of science and technology policy and artificial intelligence and were examined using the content analysis method. The research findings show that artificial intelligence can play two different roles in collaborative policy networks. In other words, two different scenarios are conceivable: the first scenario, artificial intelligence as a facilitator that leads to enhanced collaboration, transparency, interaction, and collective decision-making; and the second scenario, artificial intelligence as a dominant actor that can lead to the concentration of power, algorithmic decision-making, and a reduction in the role of human actors. The research results show that the governance and institutional design of the use of artificial intelligence determines the future path of policy-making. If used collaboratively and transparently, AI can improve the quality of policymaking and increase public value; otherwise, it can lead to concentration of power and weakening of collaboration.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
Bullock, J., Young, M. M., & Wang, Y.-F. (2020). Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service. Information Polity, 25(4), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200223.
Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the “good society”: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
Danaher, J. (2016). The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy & Technology, 29(3), 245-268.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1
DeLeon, P., & Varda, D. (2009). Toward a theory of collaborative policy networks: Identifying structural tendencies. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00295.x 
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead- Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
European Commission. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Retrieved from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York City: St. Martin’s Press.
Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Furman, J., & Seamans, R. (2019). AI and the economy. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 19, 161-191. https://doi.org/10.1086/699936
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1984). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishing.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575-586.
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101676.  
Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003
Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016). The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011.
Kalantari, E. (2024).  Collaborative science and technology policy network: Transition from present status to modified status. Shiraz: Shahcheragh Publication.
Kalantari, E., Montazer, G., & Ghazinoory, S. (2022). Modeling the characteristics and affecting determinants of collaborative science and technology policy network. Management Research in Iran, 25(3), 1-24. (Persian)
Kalantari, E., Montazer, G., & Ghazinoory, S. (2021). Modeling the characteristics of collaborative science and technology policy network. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34(5), 504-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1908537
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Governance networks in the public sector. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kuhlmann, S., & Rip, A. (2018). Next‑generation science and technology policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 448-454, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lodge, M., & Mennicken, A. (2019). Reflecting on public service regulation by algorithm. In K. Yeung & M. Lodge (Eds.), Algorithmic regulation (pp. 178–200). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198838494.003.0008
Margetts, H., & Dorobantu, C. (2019). Rethink government with AI. Nature, 568(7751), 163-165. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01099-5
Mergel, I. (2020). Digital service teams in government. Government Information Quarterly, 37(2), 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001
Meijer, A., & Bekkers, V. (2015). A metatheory of e-government: Creating some order in a fragmented research field. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.04.006
Montazer, M., Kalantari, E., & Ghazinoory, S. (2019). Theory of policy networks: An attitude for explaining the problems of the institutional structure of science and technology policy in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Islamic Revolution Studies, 16(58), 7-32. (Persian)
Navidi, A., & Gheiysari, H. R. (2023). Investigating the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in improving organizational productivity. Journal of Dynamic Management and Business Analysis, 2(2), 1-8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385089991_Investigating_the_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_AI_in_Improving_Organizational_Productivity.
OECD. (2021). OECD science, technology and innovation outlook 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2021/01/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-2021_3f424d14.html
OECD. (2019). OECD principles on artificial intelligence. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/ai-principles.html
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown Publishing Group.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243-1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
Sabet Sarvestani, M., Moghbel Baarz, A., & Afsar, A. (2019). Comparative analysis of the structural attributes of supply network firms in the auto industry (Social network analysis approach). Modern Research in Decision Making, 4(4), 59-80. (Persian)
Samoili, S., López Cobo, M., Gómez, E., De Prato, G., Martínez-Plumed, F., & Delipetrev, B. (2020). AI Watch: Defining artificial intelligence: Towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence (JRC Technical Report No. JRC118163). Publications Office of the European Union.
https://doi.org/10.2760/382730
Stahl, B. C. (2021). Artificial intelligence for a better future: An ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69978-9
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2021). Sunlight Glinting on Clouds: Deception and Autonomous Weapons Systems. In A. Henschke, A. Reed, S. Robbins, & S. Miller (Eds.), Counter-Terrorism, Ethics and Technology. Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90221-6_3.
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of artificial intelligence in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008.
SCImago Journal & Country Rank. (2022). Rankings: 1996-2025. Retrieved from: https://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php?category=1702
Scherer, M. U. (2016). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(2), 353-400. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609777
Taeihagh, A. (2025). Governance of generative AI: Ethics and policy implications. Policy & Society, 44(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/POLSOC/PUAF001
Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E. A. (2020). Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509
Veale, M., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2021). Demystifying the draft EU artificial intelligence act. Computer Law Review International, 22(4), 97-112. https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/154819168/VealeBorgesius2021_typeset.pdf/
Vayena, E., Blasimme, A., & Cohen, I. G. (2018). Machine learning in medicine: Addressing ethical challenges. PLOS Medicine, 15(11), e1002689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002689
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector_ Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Williamson, B. (2019). Datafication of education: A critical approach to emerging analytics technologies and practices. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Principles and practices of design. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351252805-14
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158
Zouridis, S., Van Eck, M. & Bovens, M. A. P. (2019). Automated discretion. In T. Evans & P. Hupe (Eds.), Discretion and the quest for controlled freedom (pp. 313-329). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_20
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs.
Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics