تحلیل تماتیک شاخص‌های ارزیابی علم، فناوری و نوآوری کشورهای منطقه سند چشم‌انداز 1404

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیئت علمی پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران(ایرانداک)

2 سازمان اداری و استخدامی کشور، امور توسعه دولت الکترونیک دکترای سیاست‌گذاری علم و فناوری، تهران،

چکیده

توجه به شاخص‌های بین‌المللی ارزیابی علم، فناوری و نوآوری2 برای تعیین جایگاه کشورها در این زمینه و نیز رقابت‌پذیری آنها لازم است ولی در مجموع، از نظر کاربرد در سیاست‌گذاری علم، فناوری و نوآوری در کشورهای در حال توسعه، کارایی و اثربخشی مطلوبی ندارند. به دلیل این محدودیت، بسیاری از کشورهای در حال توسعه نیز به ایجاد نهادهایی برای انجام ارزیابی‌ها، سنجش‌ها و توسعه چارچوب‌های ارزیابی پرداخته‌اند. در همین راستا، هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی شاخص‌های ارزیابی علم، فناوری و نوآوری، حوزه‌های موضوعی آنها و خلأ‌های موجود در کشورهای در حال توسعه است.
در این مقاله، تعدادی از کشورهای منطقه سند چشم‌انداز 1404 به لحاظ اهمیت راهبردی آنها و بر اساس معیار دسترسی به اطلاعات‌شان انتخاب شده‌اند. سپس، از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و با بررسی اسناد و مدارک موجود، اطلاعات مربوط جمع‌آوری و حوزه‌های موضوعی شاخص‌های ارزیابی علم، فناوری و نوآوری در این کشورها با روش کیفی تحلیل تم/ زمینه، بررسی، آمارگیری و توصیف شده است.
حوزه‌های موضوعی اصلی شاخص‌های علم، فناوری و نوآوری در کشورهای مورد بررسی عبارت‌اند از: سرمایه انسانی علم و فناوری و نوآوری؛ انتشارات علمی و اشاعه دانش؛ فناوری؛ نوآوری و رقابت‌پذیری؛ نهادها و محیط علم، فناوری و نوآوری؛ منابع مالی علم، فناوری و نوآوری و سرمایه‌گذاری. بر پایه نتایج، خلأها و کاستی‌های زیادی در زمینه شاخص‌هایی وجود دارد که اثرات اقتصادی و اجتماعی علم، فناوری و نوآوری را می‌سنجند و برای کشورهای در حال توسعه مهم‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Thematic Analysis of the Evaluation Indicators for Science, Technology, and Innovation of Countries in Iran’s Vision 1404 Document

نویسندگان [English]

  • Leila Namdarian 1
  • Nadia Kalantari 2
1 faculty member of Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc)
2 Ph.D. of Science and Technology Policy, Presidency The Islamic of Iran Administrative and Recruitment Organization, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Although attention to international evaluation indicators for science, technology, and innovation (STI) is necessary for determining the position of countries in this field and their competitiveness, in general, they are not efficient and effective to apply in STI policy in developing countries. Because of this limitation, many developing countries have also established institutions to conduct assessments and develop evaluation frameworks. In this regard, the purpose of this paper is studying the indicators of STI evaluation, their issue areas, and gaps in developing countries.
Several countries in Iran’s vision 1404 Document have been selected in terms of their strategic importance and based on the criteria of access to information. Then, through library studies and by reviewing the available documents, the relevant information has been collected, and the issue areas of the STI indicators in these countries have been studied, surveyed, and described with a qualitative method of thematic analysis.
The themes of STI indicators have been described. The main themes of STI indicators are: human capital of science, technology, and innovation; scientific publications and dissemination of knowledge; technology; innovation and competitiveness; institutions and environment of science, technology and innovation; financial resources of science, technology, innovation and Investment.
Based on the results, there is a large gap in the evaluation of the indicators for the economic and social impacts of science, technology, and innovation, which are very important for developing countries.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Developing Countries
  • Evaluation
  • Iran’s Vision 1404 Document
  • Indicators for Science
  • Technology and Innovation

مراجع

[1]   Walsh PP, Murphy E, Horan D. The role of science, technology and innovation in the UN 2030 agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020 May 1; 154: 119957.
[2]   Gault F. Science, technology and innovation indicators: opportunities for Africa. African Statistical Journal. 2008 May; 6 (May): 141-61.
[3]   OECD. Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs. OECD; 2007.
[4]   Fernández-Sastre J, Montalvo-Quizhpi F. The effect of developing countries' innovation policies on firms' decisions to invest in R&D. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019 Jun 1; 143: 214-23.
[5]   Cirera X, Muzi S. Measuring innovation using firm-level surveys: Evidence from developing countries. Research Policy. 2020 Apr 1; 49 (3): 103912.
[6]   Gault, F. Science, technology and innovation indicators:opportunities for Africa. The African Statistical Journal. 2008; 6: 141-162.
[7]   NEPAD.Ministerial Conference on Science and Technology: Outline of a Plan of Action, Pretoria: NEPAD. 2003.
[8]   Siyanbola, W., Adeyeye, A., Olaopa, O., & Hassan, O. Science, technology and innovation indicators in policy-making: the Nigerian experience. Palgrave Communications.2016; 2 (1): 1-9.
[9]   Konrad, N., & Wahl, D. Science, technology and development indicators for third world countries—Possibilities for analysis and grouping. Scientometrics. 1990; 19(3-4): 245-270.
[10]   Teitel, S. Science and technology indicators, country size and economic development: An international comparison. World Development. 1987; 15 (9): 1225-1235.
[11]   Chinaprayoon, C. Science, Technology and Innovation composite indicators for developing countries. Doctoral dissertation. Georgia Institute of Technology. 2007.
[12]   Nour, S. S. O. M. Assessment of science and technology indicators in Sudan. Science, Technology and Society. 2012; 17 (2): 323-354.
[13]   Iizuka, M., & Hollanders, H. The need to customise innovation indicators in developing countries. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Maastricht University. 2017.
[14]   Noroozi Chakoli, A. Assessing and analyzing the current and desired situation the country's science and technology gap and comparative study with selected countries (Turkey, Japan, USA, Israel, UK, India, Pakistan, Malaysia). Research project. Tehran: National research institute for science policy.2008. (In persion).
[15]   Salami,S.R. and Mohammadi, M. Providing a conceptual model for measuring national innovation in developing countries. Journal of technology development management. 2008; 1 (1): 73-89. (In persion).
[16]   Bitaab, A., Ghazinoory, S. Shojaei. S. A Model for Innovation Auditing at National Level. Journal of technology development management. 2013; 1 (2): 3-29. (In persion).
[17]   Maymand,M., Miramini, J. Development of science and technology indicators and knowledge-based indicators based on the strategic knowledge model in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Culture in the islamic university. 2014; 4 (4): 621-643. (In persion).
[18]   Sepehr Ghazinoory, S., and Farazkish, M. A modal for STI national evaluation based efficiency, effectiveness and Utility index. Journal of strategic studies of public policy. 2018; 8 (27): 205-229. (In persion).
[19]   Braun V., & Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006; 3 (2): 77-101.
[20]   Supreme leader of Iran. Iran’s vision 1404. 2003. www.vision1404.ir/fa/News48.aspx (Accessed on August 24, 2020).
[21]   Namdarian L. Evaluation of science, technology, and innovation (STI) in Iran. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management.2017; 11 (2): 253-271.
[22]   Board of Supervision and Assessment of Cultural and Scientific Affairs, the Supreme Council of Cultural Revolution. A glance at S&T situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2003- 2006. (In Persian).
[23]   Ministry of science, research and technology. Strategic development plan of science and technology in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2008. (In Persian).
[24]   Institute for research and planning in higher education.evaluation framework of science, technology and innovation. 2008. (In Persian).
[25]   Supreme council of Cultural Revolution. Comprehensive Scientific Map of Iran. 2011. http://shahed.ac.ir/lib/en/Lists/Research%20Guides/Attachments/9/iranian%20scientific%20map.pdf (Accessed on August 24, 2020). (In Persian).
[26]   Islamic Parliament Research Center.Evaluation system of science and technology, 2009. http://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/783885 (Accessed on August24, 2020). (In Persian).
[27]   Supreme council of Cultural Revolution. Development trend of science and technology in Iran. (2014-2019). (In Persian).
[28]   The Official Portal of Monitoring and Evaluation of Innovation and Technology, Islamic Republic Of Iran. 2017 http://iranstistat.isti.ir/fa/Indicator/Detail/1248. (Accessed on September 5, 2020). (In Persian).
[29]   Namdarian, L., Kalantari, N., Alidousti. S. [Evaluation of Science, Technology and Innovation: A Review of Indicators and Organizatio (Persian)]. Tehran: Iranian research institute for information science and technology (IRANDOC); 2017. (In Persian).
[30]   AL-Rasheed, A. Financing Science and Technology Research: KACST Experience. Paper presented in conference: Scientific Research and Technological Development in the GCC Countries. Bahrain .1998.
[31]   Kayal AA. Science and technology indicators: a framework for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. InPICMET'99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No. 99CH36310) 1999 Jul 29 (Vol. 1, pp. 288-vol). IEEE.
[32]   Alshayea A. Scientific Research in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Potential for Excellence and Indicators of Underdevelopment. Higher Education Studies. 2013; 3 (5):47-51.
[33]   OECD. A summary of the Frascati manual. Paris: OECD Publishing. 2002.
www.tubitak.gov.tr/tubitak_content_files/BTYPD/kilavuzlar/Frascati.pdf.
[34]   OECD. OECD Science, technology and industry outlook 2012. Paris: OECD Publishing 2012. www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-andtechnology/oecd-science-technology-and-industry-outlook-2012_sti_outlook-2012-en.
[35]   ENIP. European Network of Indicators Producers. Country report Israel. 2005.         
http://search.usi.ch/en/projects/129/enip-european-network-ofindicators-Producers
[36]   Wu T, Li Y. A Review of the National Green Innovation System in Israel. InIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2019 Apr (Vol. 252, No. 4, p. 042120). IOP Publishing.
[37]   Al-Awadhi, N., and Y. Al-Sultan. National science, technology and innovation policy for the State of Kuwait. Kuwait: Institute for Scientific Research. 2007.
www.kisr.edu.kw/pubs/en/books2-72-41-99906/pdf.
[38]   Shihab-Eldin, A. Strengthening STI system to support building Knowledge-Based Economy) KBE) in Kuwait: The Role of KFAS, Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences) KFAS(. 2016.
[39]   Dobrinsky R. The National Innovation System of Azerbaijan in the Context of the Effective Development and Diffusion of Green Technologies. In Presentation to the Joint National Seminar on Ways to Green Industry. Astana 2013 Oct. 23-25.
[40]   National coordination council on sustainable development. Second voluntary national review of the Republic of Azerbaijan on the implementation of Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. 2019.
[41]   The state statistical committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Education, science and culture indicators. 2016. www.stat.gov.az/source/education/indexen.php.
[42]   UNESCO. Science, technology and innovation policy for Lebanon, National Council for Scientific Research, Lebanon. 2008.
[43]   Gaillard J. Evaluation of Scientific, Technology and Innovation Capabilities in Lebanon. IRD, Paris: (in collaboration with Jacques Kabbanji, Joseph Bechara and Mona Assaf). 2007.
[44]   Osama A, Hassan SZ, Chatha KA. The atlas of Islamic-world science and innovation: Country case study no. 3. InLahore: The Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) 2012.
[45]   Shahid M. S&T indicators of Pakistan: A country report. In2010 South Asian Regional Workshop on STI Indicators, Kathmandu, Nepal 2010 Dec 6.
[46]   Bashir, M. Science, technology and innovation indicators of Pakistan. Islamabad: Ministry of Science and Technology. www.pcst.org.pk/docs/STIIndicators2014.pdf. 2014.
[47]   Bond M, Maram H, Soliman A, Khattab R. Science and innovation in Egypt. London: Royal Society. 2012.
[48]   ECASTI. Science, technology and innovation in Egypt. The Egyptian center for the advancement of science, technology and innovation. 2014.      
www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct =j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjZx-DErejSAhXJEiwK HY3OBAoQFggmMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2F.
www.ecasti.org%2F%3Fwpdmact%3Dprocess%26did%3DMTEuaG90bGluaw%3D%3D&usg=AFQjCNHbwY46jPEqAdwG3rsvhAFRwtxCA&sig2=rQuWcKebP7L2Zs2yljYw.
[49]   Academy of Scientific Research & Technology. Egyptian science and technology indicators. 2015. 2016 http://www.asrt.sci.eg/images/vol5.pdf
[50]   David A, Szigetvari T. Scientific cooperation between the European Union and Turkey–advantages and possible synergies. Institute for World Economics-Centre for Economic and Regional Studies-Hungarian Academy of Sciences; 2015 Nov.
[51]   TUBITAK. Turkish ERA Roadmap; National roadmap on European research area. 2019.
[52]   TUBITAK. Science, technology, and innovation in turkey 2012. Scientific and Technological Research Council: Department of Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. 2013.
[53]   Turkish statistical institute. Main Statistics of Science, Technology and Information Society. 2017.     
www.turkstat.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist.
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار