آینده‌نگاری، و سیاست‌گذاری علم، فناوری و نوآوری

نوع مقاله : نقطه نظر

نویسنده

عضو هیئت علمی گروه پژوهشی مطالعات آینده علم و فناوری، مرکز تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور

چکیده

 
می‌توان ادعا کرد طی سالیانی که این مجله منتشرشده، ذهنیت مشترکی بین پژوهشگران هر دو حوزه شکل‌گرفته است. اما کماکان سؤالاتی به‌ویژه در محدوده اشتراک و تعامل این دو مفهوم مطرح هستند که کماکان پاسخ صریحی دریافت ننموده‌اند. یکی از این سؤالات در حوزه اثرگذاری آینده‌نگاری بر سیاست‌گذاری مطرح می‌شود که در اجتماع علمی پاسخ‌هایی به‌ویژه از منظر کارکردی و اجرایی به آن داده‌شده است. در این یادداشت قصد دارم دریچه‌ای بر نگاهی نظری بگشایم و به این چالش عمیق‌تر از گذشته بنگرم.
 
[1

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Foresight, and science, technology and innovation policy

نویسنده [English]

  • Reza Hafezi
Faculty member of the research group for future studies of science and technology,nrisp
چکیده [English]

it can be claimed that during the years that this journal has been published, a common mentality has been formed between the researchers of both fields. But there are still questions, especially in the scope of sharing and interaction of these two concepts, which have not yet received a clear answer. One of these questions is raised in the field of the impact of foresight on policy-making, which has been answered in the scientific community, especially from the functional and executive perspective. In this note, I intend to open a theoretical perspective and look at this challenge more deeply than in the past

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Foresight
  • policy
  • science
  • technology
  • innovation

مراجع

  • Harper, J.C., Impact of technology foresight: compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention. Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, 2013.
  • Havas, A., D. Schartinger, and M. Weber, The impact of foresight on innovation policy-making: recent experiences and future perspectives. Research Evaluation, 2010. 19 (2): p. 91-104.
  • Hafezi, R., S. Malekifar, and A. Akhavan, Analyzing Iran’s science and technology foresight programs: recommendations for further practices. foresight, 2018.
  • Saritas, O., S. Burmaoglu, and D. Ozdemir, THE EVOLUTION OF FORESIGHT: WHAT EVIDENCE IS THERE IN SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS? Futures, 2022.
  • Sokolova, A., Pre-foresight integrative methodology for STI policy: Increasing coherence and impact. Futures, 2022. 135: p. 102875.
  • Milojević, I. and S. Inayatullah, Narrative foresight. Futures, 2015. 73: p. 151-162.
  • Hafezi, R., et al., Global natural gas demand to 2025: A learning scenario development model. Energy, 2021. 224: p. 120167.
  • Hafezi, R., et al., A Layered Uncertainties Scenario Synthesizing (LUSS) model applied to evaluate multiple potential long-run outcomes for Iran's natural gas exports. Energy, 2019. 169: p. 646-659.
  • Amer, M., A. Jetter, and T. Daim, Development of fuzzy cognitive map (FCM)‐based scenarios for wind energy. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 2011.
  • Merrie, A., et al., Radical ocean futures-scenario development using science fiction prototyping. Futures, 2018. 95: p. 22-32.
  • Burnam-Fink, M., Creating narrative scenarios: Science fiction prototyping at Emerge. Futures, 2015. 70: p. 48-55.
  • Hassanzadeh, A., et al., Impact of technology foresight on the policy-making process in Iran. Science, Technology and Society, 2014. 19 (3): p. 275-304.
  • Rhisiart, M., E. Störmer, and C. Daheim, From foresight to impact? The 2030 Future of Work scenarios. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017. 124: p. 203-213.
  • Meissner, D. and P. Rudnik, Creating sustainable impact from foresight on STI policy. foresight, 2017.
  • Li, N., K. Chen, and M. Kou, Technology foresight in China: Academic studies, governmental practices and policy applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017. 119: p. 246-255.
  • Schmidt, J.M., Policy, planning, intelligence and foresight in government organizations. Foresight, 2015.
  • Andersen, A.D. and P.D. Andersen, Foresighting for inclusive development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017. 119: p. 227-236.
  • Van Dorsser, C., et al., Improving the link between the futures field and policymaking. Futures, 2018. 104: p. 75-84.
  • Wright, D., B. Stahl, and T. Hatzakis, Policy scenarios as an instrument for policymakers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020. 154: 11972.

 

فایل ها

همرسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار