تسهیل کننده‌ها و پیش برنده‌های چابکی سازمانی در آموزش عالی کشاورزی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکترای آموزش کشاورزی دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی خوزستان

2 عضو هیات علمی گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی

3 دانشیار ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشگاه رازی

چکیده

دانشگاه‌ها و مؤسسات آموزش عالی کشاورزی در مسیر پیشرفت خود با تغییراتی چون تحولات سریع تکنولوژیکی، تغییرات عمده در بازار کار، انتظارات ذینفعان، بودجه، رقابت‌های ملی و بین المللی و محرک‌های بی‌شمار دیگری مواجه هستند که تهدیدی برای شیوه‌های سنتی در دانشگاه‌ها محسوب شده و نیاز به انجام بهتر، سریع‌تر و کم‌هزینه‌تر فعالیت‌ها را ضرورت بخشیده است. برای کسب موفقیت در این شرایط چابکی جهت بقاء و حفظ پیشرفت، یک مزیت رقابتی را ایجاد می‌کند که می‌توان با نوآوری و کیفیت در تولید علم آن را حفظ نمود. دانشگاه‌های چابک فرآیندها و افراد سازمان را با تکنولوژی پیشرفته همگام ساخته، نیازهای مشتریان را براساس خدمات و برای رویارویی با محیط پیچیده کسب و کار آماده و مهیا می‌سازند. این در حالی مطرح است که تحقیقات به عمل آمده گواه آن است که سطح چابکی سازمانی دانشگاه‌ها و مؤسسات آموزش عالی کشور مطلوب نیست. از این رو است که عواملی که باعث ایجاد چابکی دانشگاهی می-گردند، همواره مورد تأکید برنامه ریزان و سیاست گذاران دانشگاهی بوده است. لذا، هدف این پژوهش کیفی شناسایی تسهیل کننده‌ها و پیش برنده‌های چابکی دانشگاهی به عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین عامل‌های مؤثر در چابک‌سازی مدیریت آموزش عالی کشاورزی ایران بود. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌های عمیق با متخصصان و صاحب نظران آموزش عالی کشاورزی که از تجربه‌ی مدیریتی در سمت‌های ستاره‌دار دانشگاهی نیز برخوردار بودند (20 مصاحبه فردی)، جمع‌آوری و با روش تحلیل خط به خط و در قالب تحلیل محتوای متعارف با استفاده از نرم افزار MAXqda11 پردازش شدند. براساس یافته‌ها مؤلفه‌ها‌ی شناسایی شده آسان‌کننده‌های چابکی شامل: ساختار منعطف، نیروی کار چابک، بهبود مستمر در تفکر و عمل، فرهنگ تغییر، استفاده از فناوری اطلاعات توسط دانشگاه و برقراری رابطه، تعامل و همکاری مؤثر با محیط (6 مؤلفه) می-باشند. توجه به شاخص‌ها و مؤلفه‌های چابکی یاد شده برای دست‌یابی به توانایی کسب اطلاعات لازم برای تصمیم‌گیری مدیران در مؤسسه‌های آموزش عالی کشاورزی ضروری هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Facilitators and Promoters of Organizational Agility in in Iranian Agricultural Higher Education

نویسندگان [English]

  • Soheila Pourjavid 1
  • bahman khosravipour 2
  • Amirhossein Alibaygi 3
1 Ph.D of Agricultural Extension and Education, University of Khuzestan Agriculture and Natural Resources
2 Faculty of agricultural education and extension department
3 , Associate professor of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Razi University
چکیده [English]

Agricultural universities and institutions of higher education are faced with changes such as rapid technological developments, major changes in the labor market, stakeholder expectations, budgets, national and international competition and countless other drivers that threaten traditional methods in their development. Universities are considered and the need to do better, faster and less expensive activities has become necessary. In order to achieve success in these agile conditions for survival and maintaining progress, it creates a competitive advantage that can be maintained with innovation and quality in the production of science. Agile universities synchronize the processes and people of the organization with advanced technology, prepare and prepare the needs of customers based on services and to face the complex business environment. This is mentioned while the research done proves that the level of organizational agility of the country's universities and higher education institutions is not favorable. This is why the factors that create academic agility have always been emphasized by academic planners and policy makers. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative research was to identify the facilitators and promoters of university agility as one of the most important effective factors in making the management of agricultural higher education in Iran more agile. Data were collected through in-depth and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using MAXqda11 software. Based on the findings Agility facilitators identified as flexible structure, agile workforce, continuous improvement in thinking and action, culture of change, use of Information technology by the university, and establishing the relationships, interactions and effective cooperation of agricultural university with Environment (6 components). Considering the above components is essential for agility of higher agricultural education system, and improving of decision making process in agricultural universities.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Agile University
  • University Agility Facilitators
  • Competitive Advantage
  • Agricultural Higher Education
  • Agriculture section

مراجع

[1] Wilhelm C, Maconachie R. Exploring local content in Guinea's bauxite sector: Obstacles, opportunities and future trajectories. Resources Policy. 2021;71:101935.
[2] Kalyuzhnova Y, Belitski M. The impact of corruption and local content policy in on firm performance: Evidence from Kazakhstan. Resources Policy. 2019; 61:67-76.
[3] Lebdioui A. Local content in extractive industries: Evidence and lessons from Chile’s copper sector and Malaysia’s petroleum sector. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020; 7 (2): 341-52.
[4] Chernysheva O, Shelyakov A, Sitnikov N, Veligzhanin A, Borodako K, Sundeev R. Local atomic and crystal structure of rapidly quenched TiNiCu shape memory alloys with high copper content. Materials Letters. 2021; 285:129104.
[5] Hansen UE, Nygaard I, Morris M, Robbins G. The effects of local content requirements in auction schemes for renewable energy in developing countries: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2020; 127:109843.
[6] Azevedo Filho ET, Palma MAM, Perestrelo M, da Hora HRM, Lira RA. The pre-salt layer and challenges to competitiveness in Brazil: Critical reflections on the local content policy in the oil and gas Sector. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2019; 6 (4):1168-73.
[7] Bazilian M, Cuming V, Kenyon T. Local-content rules for renewables projects don't always work. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2020;32:100569.
[8] Ablo AD. Enterprise development? Local content, corporate social responsibility and disjunctive linkages in Ghana’s oil and gas industry. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020; 7 (2): 321-7.
[9] Atienza M, Arias-Loyola M, Lufin M. Building a case for regional local content policy: The hollowing out of mining regions in Chile. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020; 7 (2):292-301.
[10] Lima-de-Oliveira R. Corruption and local content development: Assessing the impact of the Petrobras’ scandal on recent policy changes in Brazil. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020; 7 (2): 274-82.
[11] Allan G, Comerford D, Connolly K, McGregor P, Ross AG. The economic and environmental impacts of UK offshore wind development: The importance of local content. Energy. 2020; 199: 117436.
[12] Klueh U, Department FmiA. Inter-sectoral Linkages and Local Content in Extractive Industries and Beyond: The Case of São Tomé and Príncipe: International Monetary Fund, African Department; 2007.
[13] Kragelund P. Using local content policies to engender resource-based development in Zambia: A chronicle of a death foretold? The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020; 7 (2): 267-73.
[14] Jahromi FS. An appraisal of local content requirements in the Iranian oil and gas industry. Resources Policy. 2021; 73: 102151.
[15] Grossman SJ. The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality. The Journal of Law & Economics. 1981; 24 (3): 461-83.
[16] Geenen S. Gold and godfathers: Local content, politics, and capitalism in extractive industries. World Development. 2019; 123: 104605.
[17] Adedeji AN, Sidique SF, Rahman AA, Law SH. The role of local content policy in local value creation in Nigeria's oil industry: A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Resources Policy. 2016; 49: 61-73.
[18] Barlow A. The politics of the temporary: Tanzanian local content in the East African crude oil pipeline. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020; 7 (2): 738-47.
[19] Calignano G, Vaaland TI. Local content in Tanzania: Are local suppliers motivated to improve? The Extractive Industries and Society. 2018; 5 (1): 104-13.
[20] Caramento A. Cultivating backward linkages to Zambia’s copper mines: Debating the design of, and obstacles to, local content. The Extractive Industries and Society. 2020; 7 (2): 310-20.
[21] Heum P, editor Local content development : experiences from oil and gas activities in Norway. 2008.
[22] Noruzi M. Upstream petroleum's contracts Capacity on the transfer and development of technology with approach of the critical success factors. [In Persian], Journal Strategic Studies of Public Policy. 2018; 8 (27): 19-48.
[23] Liu X, Wang Y, Du W, Ma Y. Economic policy uncertainty, oil price volatility and stock market returns: Evidence from a nonlinear model. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance. 2022; 62: 101777.
[24] Bandarian, R. examining the reasons for the lack of formation of powerful technological start-ups in the global arena of the upstream sector of the oil industry. [In Persian], Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Monthly, 2018; 170: 61-71.
[25] Amirghodsi S, Maleki A, Shavvalpour S. Investigating factors behind lack of technological dveleopment in Iranian oil industry through Comparative study with Norway. Journal Strategic Studies of Public Policy. 2017; 6 (21): 183-209.
[26] Nwankwo E, Iyeke S. Analysing the impact of oil and gas local content laws on engineering development and the GDP of Nigeria. Energy Policy. 2022; 163 (C): S0301421522000611.
[27] Faridzad A, Ghafari A. Economic and Legal Considerations of Oil Equipment Production Used in Upstream Sector in Iran with Emphasis on Technology Transfer in IPC. [In Persian], IRANIAN JOURNAL OF TRADE STUDIES (IJTS). 2018;22(86):89-124.
[28] Yazdi N, Jassbi A, Maleki A, Naeini AB. Comparative Conceptualisation of ‘Public Procurement for Capability Building’ (PPCB) In Relation to Public Procurement for Innovation (PPI): A Step Towards Implementation of Iranian Technology Annex. [In Persian], Innovation Management Journal. 2019; 8 (3): 127-54.
[29] Kalyuzhnova Y, Azhgaliyeva D, Belitski M. Public Policy Instruments for Procurement: An Empirical Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022; 176: 121472.
[30] Scholvin S. Peripheral development through extractive industries?: Gateways, local content policy, and the oil and gas sector in Neuquén and Río Negro, Argentina. Applied Geography. 2021; 135: 102554.
[31] Mirimoghadam M, Ghazinoory S, Towfighi J, Elahi S. Technological Learning in Petroleum Industry: Case Study of Development Projects in South Pars Gas Field. [In Persian], Journal of Science & Technology Policy. 2015; 8 (2): 17.
[32] Noruzi M. Examine Barriers to Technology Transfer and Development in the Upstream Sector of the Oil Industry: Analytical Perspective. [In Persian], Quarterly Energy Economics Review. 2017; 13 (52): 181-215.
[33] Arena M, Azzone G, Dell’Agostino L, Scotti F. Precision policies and local content targets in resource-rich developing countries: The case of the oil and gas sector in Mozambique. Resources Policy. 2022; 76: 102597.
[34] Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. 2022; 314-22.
[35] Freeman G, Ding Y, Milojevic S. Citation Content Analysis (CCA): A Framework for Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Citation Content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013; 64.
[36] Erdelyi M. Quantitative Content-Analysis. 2022; 118-49.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار