واکاوی برنامه های سیاستی توسعه و تقویت زیست بوم های نوآوری؛ یک اقدام پژوهی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار مدیریت فنّاوری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، قم، ایران

چکیده

امروزه مفهوم و نظریه زیست بوم نوآوری به صورت فراگیر و جدی مورد توجه پژوهشگران و سیاستگذاران عرصه نوآوری قرار گرفته است. این مفهوم به همه عاملان اقتصادی و روابط اقتصادی و نیز اجزای غیراقتصادی نظیر فناوری ها، نهادها، تعاملات اجتماعی و فرهنگ اشاره دارد که امکان شکل گیری و انتشار نوآوری را فراهم می سازند. پژوهش حاضر که از رویکردی کیفی و استراتژی اقدام پژوهی بهره می برد، به واکاوی یک برنامه سیاستی با نام توسعه و ارتقای زیست بوم نوآوری استان ها (تانا) پرداخته است که در وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری و در پاسخ به یک مسئله سیاستی یعنی ضعف و نارسایی در زیست بوم نوآوری استان ها انجام شده است. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که برنامه مذکور دارای نقاط مثبت و مزیت هایی نظیر ترویج گفتمان نوآوری، تقویت پیوند میان دانشگاه ها، مراکز پژوهشی و مراکز فناوری و افزایش مشروعیت پارک های علم و فناوری در میان بازیگران زیست بوم نوآوری استان ها دارد. بعلاوه، برنامه دارای ضعف ها و نارسایی هایی است که در چهار بعد طرف عرضه و ایده، طرف تقاضا و نیاز، طرف سازمان مجری و طرف سیاست گذار مورد مشاهده و شناسایی قرار گرفتند. در ادامه، این چالش ها و نارسایی ها مبنایی برای ارائه راهکارها و پیشنهاداتی برای بهبود و تقویت برنامه در پنج حوزه شامل حمایت های مالی و سرمایه گذاری، حمایت از فرهنگ سازی و ترویج گفتمان، حمایت از ایده پردازی و تیم سازی، تشویق و تحریک طرف تقاضا و حمایت از شبکه سازی و همرسانی قرار گرفته اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the policy programs for development and enhancement of innovation ecosystems; An action research

نویسنده [English]

  • Mostafa Safdari Ranjbar
Assistant Professor of Management of Technology, Department of Management and Accounting, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran
چکیده [English]

Today, the concept and theory of the ecosystem of innovation has received the attention of researchers and policy makers in the field of innovation in an inclusive and serious way. This concept refers to all economic factors and economic relationships as well as non-economic components such as technologies, institutions, social interactions and culture that enable the formation and diffusion of innovation. The present study, which uses a qualitative approach and action research strategy, has analyzed a policy program called the development and enhancement of the province's innovation ecosystem (TANA) which was implemented in the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in response to a policy problem means weakness and inadequacy in the ecosystem of innovation in different provinces. The findings of the research show that the mentioned program has positive points and advantages such as promoting innovation discourse, strengthening the link between universities, research centers and technology centers and increasing legitimacy of science and technology parks among the actors of the province's innovation ecosystem. In addition, the weaknesses and inadequacies of program were observed and identified in four dimensions including the supply and idea side, the demand and need side, the executive organization side and the policy side were observed and identified. Then, these weaknesses and inadequacies are used as a basis for providing solutions and suggestions to improve and strengthen the program in five areas as follow: financial support and investment, support for cultural development and promotion of discourse, support for ideation and team building, encouraging and stimulating the demand side and supporting networking and match-making.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Innovation ecosystem
  • policy program
  • supply and idea side
  • demand and need side
  • science and technology parks

مراجع

Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84 (4), 98.
Asadi Fard, R., Khaledi, A. (2019). Challenges of asymmetric technological collaboration between large companies and nanotechnology startups. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12 (3), 15-30. (Persian)
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43 (7), 1097-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
Clarck, D., & Claffy, K. (2015). Anchoring policy development around stable points: An approach to regulating the co-evolving ICT ecosystem. Telecommunications Policy, 39 (10), 848-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.003
Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Bruneel, J. (2014). Creating value in ecosystem: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystem. Research Policy, 43 (7), 1164-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.014
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S., & Ortt, J. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
Denscombe, M. (2017). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. 6th Edition. Berkshire, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
Dias Sant´ Ana, T., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., Moreira, M. F., & de Souza, W. V. B. (2020). The structure of an innovation ecosystem: Foundations for future research. Management Decision, 58 (12), 2725-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2019-0383
Amini, M. (2012). An umbrella named action research. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11 (9), 1223-30.
Elyasi, M., & Malekifar, F. (2019). STI policies to augment innovation ecosystems. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12 (2). 209-20. (Persian)
Esmailipour Masouleh, E., Afshari-Mofrad, M., & Bashiri, M. (2022). Innovation ecosystem in Iran’s automotive industry; What it has, what it lacks. Journal of Improvement Management, 15 (4), 105-27. (Persian)
Fukuda, K. (2020). Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.033
Ghaseni Nejad, Y., Baradaran, M, S. (2020). Strategies for commercializing military technologies; From dual-use technology to ecosystem development. Journal of Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 3 (1), 1-28. (Persian) DOI: 10.22034/QJIMDO.2020.199418.1184
Gomes, A. V., Leonardo, L. F. F, Ana, Sergio, S. M., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps, and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
Granstrand, O., & Holersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystem: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Hesabi, F., & Kheradmand Nia, S. (2022). On the path of knowledge-based and job-creating production: Institutional pathology of science and technology commercialization system in the country. Tehran: Islamic Council Research Center. (Persian)
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82 (3), 1-11.
Jackson, D. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem: Lessons from the software sector. California Management Review, 48 (3), 28-47.
Jackson, D. (2011). What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation-sponsored Engineering Research Centers. Retrieved September, 01, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Deborah_Jackson2/publication/266414637_What_is_an_Innovation_Ecosystem/links/551438490cf2eda0df30714f.pdf
Liu, Z., & Stephens, V. (2019). Exploring innovation ecosystem from the perspective of sustainability: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Open Innovation, Technology, Market and Complexity, 5 (3), 48. DOI: 10.3390/joitmc5030048
Malekifar, F., & Elyasi, M. (2021). Innovation ecosystem: From metaphor to strategy. Tehran: National Research Institute for Science Policy. (Persian)
Mazzucato, M., & Robinson, D. (2018). Co-creating and directing innovation ecosystems? NASA's changing approach to public-private partnerships in low-earth orbit. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 136, 166-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.034
McNiff, J., Whitehead, J. 2002. Action Research: Principles and Practice. London: Routledge.
Mercan, B., & Goktas, D. (2011). Components of innovation ecosystems: A cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76 (16), 102-12.
Mohammadi, M., Yazdani, H. R., & Ojaghi, H. (2019). Identification of the main actors and key roles of the startup innovation ecosystem: A case study in Hamedan Province. Innovation Management Journal, 8 (1), 21-56. (Persian)
Moore, J. (1993). Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71 (3), 75-86.
Moore, J. (1996). the death of competition - leadership & strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New Jersey: Wily.
Naghizadeh, R., Namdarian, L. (2019). The supportive policies for New Technology-Based Firms NTBFss). Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12 (2), 285-96. (Persian)
National Research Council. (2007). Innovation policies for the 21st century: Report of a symposium. Washington: National Academies Press.
North. D. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspective, 5 (1), 97-112.
Oh, D. S., Philips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54 (1), 1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Pakzad, M., Ghazinoory, S., & Fatemy, M. (2021). Designing a policy mix for the development of East Azerbaijan innovation ecosystem; Case study: Auto parts manufacturing industry. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 7 (1), 97-117. (Persian) DOI: 10.22059/JPPOLICY.2021.81990
Rabelo, R. J., & Bernus, P. (2015). A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems. Ifac-Papersonline, 48 (3), 2250-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.423
Reillon, V. (2016 February). Understanding innovation. European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieve September, 10, 2023 From http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/573968/EPRS_BRI(2016)573968_EN.pdf
Rinkinen, S., & Harmaakorpi, V. (2019). Business and innovation ecosystems: Innovation policy implications. International Journal of Public Policy, 15 (3-4), 248-65. DOI: 10.1504/IJPP.2019.103038
Russell, M., & Smorodinskaya, N. (2018). Leveraging complexity for ecosystem innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 136, 114-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.024
Russell, M., Still, K., Huhtamaki, J., Yu, C., & Rubens, N. (2011 July 10-11). Transforming innovation ecosystems through a shared vision and network orchestration [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the Triple Helix IX international conference. Stanford, United States.
Samsampour, S., Shahmansoury, A., Cheraghali, M. H., & Sohrabi, T. (2020). Investigation and analysis of Hormozgan Province's fisheries and aquaculture industry innovation ecosystem. Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 10 (3), 82-99. (Persian)
Smorodinskaya, N., Russell, M., Katukov, D., & Still, K. (2017 January 4-7). Innovation ecosystems vs. innovation systems in terms of collaboration and co-creation of value [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii, United States of America.
Talmer, M., Walrave, B., Podoynitsyna, K., Holmstrom, J., & Romme, A. G. L. (2020). Mapping, analyzing and designing innovation ecosystems: The Ecosystem Pie Model. Long Range Planning. 53 (4), 101850. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2018.09.002
Wessner, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem policy lessons from the United States. Discussion paper on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy. Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Jena, Germany.
Yosefi, H., Nasiri, H., & Zeraat Kish, Y. (2021). The proposed priorities of the higher education system and research in the seventh development plan. Tehran: Islamic Council Research Center. (Persian)

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار