موانع پیاده‌سازی نظام ملی نشر علمی در ایران

نوع مقاله : ترویجی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران(ایرانداک)،تهران ، ایران

2 دکتری علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، استادیار پژوهشگاه علوم و فناوری اطلاعات ایران(ایرانداک)،تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد یادگار امام خمینی (ره) شهرری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران ایران

چکیده

چکیده
هدف پژوهش: هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین مشکلات زیست‌بوم نشر علمی ایران برای پیاده‌سازی نظام نشر علمی در کشور است تا برنامه‌ریزی و سیاست‌گذاری جامع، کنترل یکپارچه، ارتباطات گسترده در بستر زیرساخت‌های متفاوت و نظایر آن فراهم شود تا بازیگران این زیست‌بوم بتوانند به منابع اطلاعاتی گسترده و متخصصان مختلف دسترسی یابند.
روش پژوهش: در این پژوهش از روش کیفی و تحلیل محتوا استفاده‌شده‌است. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات، مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختار‌یافته-است. جامعه پژوهش شامل خبرگان نشر علمی کشور است که نمونه آن شامل 19 نفر از متخصصانی است که در مراکز علمی مشغول به فعالیت علمی یا اجرایی هستند. برای استخراج داده‌ها متن مصاحبه‌ها به تفکیک پرسش‌ها در نرم افزار MaxQDA بارگذاری شد و پاسخ هر یک از پرسش‌ها، در قالب کدهای باز در نرم افزار تعریف ‌شد.
یافته‌های پژوهش: آسیب‌های زیست‌بوم نشر علمی در 4 بعد: پیامدهای نبود یک نظام یکپارچه در راستای نشر علمی، چالش‌های احتمالی در پیاده‌سازی نظام نشر علمی در کشور، مسئولیت و مدیریت نظام نشر علمی کشور، و اشخاص (حقیقی/ حقوقی) هسته در برنامه‌ریزی و تصمیم گیری‌های کلان نشر علمی، شناسایی شد. مسائل زیست‌بوم نشر علمی کشور به طور کلی به مشکلات فعلی و مشکلات آتی نظام نشر علمی تقسیم‌می‌شود. یافته‌های این پژوهش در بخش مشکلات فعلی شامل: یکپارچه نبودن سامانه‌های نشرعلم، نبود آینده‌نگری و پیش‌بینی برای بحران‌های آتی؛ و در بخش مشکلات آتی شامل: جامع نبودن و یا کهنه بودن قوانین و مقررات نشر علمی و نبود قوانینی متناسب با بستر جدید، قوانین انحصاری، استقلال‌طلبی، تملک‌خواهی است.
نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به موانعی که در زیست‌بوم نشر علمی کشور شناسایی شده، لازم است موانع قبل از راه‌اندازی نظام نشر علمی از طریق آموزش، آگاهی‌رسانی و شفاف‌سازی، و مطالعات بیشتر، برطرف گردد تا نظام نشر علمی کشور بتواند به کارایی و بازدهی مناسب دست‌یابد.
کلیدواژه‌ها: نظام نشر علمی، زیست‌بوم نشر علمی، آسیب‌شناسی ، نشر علمی، نشر دانشگاهی، ایران.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Challenges of Implementing a National Scholarly Publication System in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Afrooz Hamrahi 1
  • Roya pournaghI 2
  • dariush matlabi 3
1 Ph.D. in Knowledge and Information Science; Research Institution for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran
2 Ph.D. in Knowledge and Information Science; Assistant Professor; Research Institution for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor of Human Science Faculty, Islamic Azad University, Yadegar Imam Khomeini (RAH) branch, Shahr-e-Rey, Tehran. Iran
چکیده [English]

The Challenges of Implementing a National Scholarly Publication System in Iran
Background and Objectives: In order to achieve a stronger position in international scientific communities, it is necessary to strengthen the country's science publishing ecosystem by tackling pathology and removing barriers. In this research, we have explored the complex challenges facing the Iranian scientific publishing ecosystem in order to find out which obstacles are preventing an effective implementation of a robust scholarly publication system.
Methodology: This research employed a qualitative methodology, utilizing content analysis to delve into the experiences and perspectives of Iranian scientific publishing experts. The primary data collection tool was a semi-structured interview, designed to elicit rich and nuanced insights from participants. A purposive sample of 19 specialists, actively engaged in scientific or executive roles within scientific centers, was selected for the study. To facilitate data analysis, the researchers utilized MaxQDA software. Within this platform, answers to each interview question were meticulously coded as open codes, allowing for the identification of patterns, themes, and recurring ideas across participant responses.
Findings: the obstacles to the scientific publishing ecosystem were examined in 4 dimensions, which include the disadvantages of the lack of an integrated system in the direction of scientific publishing, possible issues in the implementation of the scientific publishing system in Iran, Lack of determination of responsibility and management in the scientific publishing system. The lack of identification of the core players in the planning and decision-making of scientific publishing.
Discussion: The problems of the scientific publishing ecosystem of Iran are generally divided into current problems and future problems of the scientific publishing. The findings of this research in the field of current problems include the lack of integration of science publishing systems, the lack of foresight and forecasting for future crises, the lack of a defined institution for the management of scientific publishing; And in the section of future problems include the non-comprehensive laws or outdated regulations and the lack of laws that are suitable for an integrated system of scientific publication, the exclusive rules given to some organizations according to the statutes or regulations, the lack of concern and priority of the future of scientific publication for policy makers and the scientific community, independence and reluctance of scientific centers to participate in the integrated system of scholarly publications.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • scholarly publications system
  • scholarly publications ecosystem
  • pathology
  • scientific publishing
  • academic publishing
  • Iran

مراجع

Abdekhoda, M., Alibeyk, M., Hossini, F., Ravand, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2015). Tehran University of Medical Science faculties’ member’s attitude toward open access to scientific article: A survey study. Health Information Management, 11(7), 937-944. (Persian)
Abu-Zidan, F. M., & Rizk, D. E. (2005). Research in developing countries: Problems and solutions. International Urogynecology Journal, 16, 174-175. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-004-1278-x
Afsharkohan J., Balali E., & Rahimi S. (2023). Pathology of scientific relations among faculty members of universities of Iran. Social Problems of Iran. 14(1), 9-33. (Persian) DOI:10.61186/jspi.14.1.9
Altbach, P., & De Wit, H. (2018). The problem is the publishing system, not the scholars. London: University World News.
Amarante, V., Burger, R., Chelwa, G., Cockburn, J., Kassouf, A., McKay, A., & Zurbrigg, J. (2021). Underrepresentation of developing country researchers in development research. Applied Economics Letters, 29(17), 1659-1664. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2021.1965528
Azadi Ahmadabadi, Gh., & Nourmohammadi, H. (2016). Scientific and technological productions of Iran (2006-2015) with a comparison to some other countries. Science and Technology Policy Letters, 6(3), 61-74. (Persian)
Babb, M. N. (2021). Canadian academics’ use of predatory journals. The Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 42(3), 140-153. DOI: 10.29173/jchla29579
Badenhorst, C., & Xu, X. (2016). Academic publishing: Making the implicit explicit. Publications, 4(3), 24-40. DOI: 10.3390/publications4030024
Bagheri Dolatabadi, A., & Enfeali, S. (2014). University and science production; Necessities and structural barriers [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Islamic Humanities. Tehran, Iran. (Persian)
Beall, J. (2015). The “Metric” system: Yet more chaos in scholarly publishing. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 6(11), 2020-2021. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00910
Beigel, F., Packer, A. L., Gallardo, O., & Salatino, M. (2022). OLIVA: The scientific production indexed in Latin America and the Caribbean. Disciplinary diversity, institutional collaboration, and multilingualism in SciELO and Redalyc (1995-2018). SciELO Preprints, e20210134. DOI: 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.4637
Bemelmans, T. (1979). Strategic planning for research and development. Long Range Planning, 12(2), 33-44. DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(79)90071-2
Ben-David, J., & Zloczower, A. (1962). Universities and academic systems in modern societies. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 3(1), 45-84. DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600000527
Besir Demir, S. (2018). A mixed-methods study of the ex post funding incentive policy for scholarly publications in Turkey. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49(4), 453-476. DOI: 10.3138/jsp.49.4.05
Bierbaum, R., Cowie, A., Barra, R., Ratner, B., Sims, R., Stocking, M., ... & Whaley, C. (2018). Integration: To solve complex environmental problems. Washington: Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34698.52162
Boaz, A., Hanney, S., Borst, R., O'Shea, A., & Kok, M. (2018). How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 60-70. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6
Buckner, E. (2022). Embracing the global: The role of ranking, research mandate, and sector in the internationalisation of higher education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 52(2), 232-249. DOI: 10.1080/03057925.2020.1753499
Chien, S. C. (2019). Writing for scholarly publication in English for Taiwanese researchers in the field of English teaching. Sage Open, 9(3), 2158244019870187. DOI: 10.1177/2158244019870187
Elgamri, A., Mohammed, Z., El-Rhazi, K., Shahrouri, M., Ahram, M., Al-Abbas, A. M., & Silverman, H. (2023). Challenges facing Arab researchers in publishing scientific research: A qualitative interview study. Research Square, rs.3.rs-3129329. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3129329/v1
Erfanmanesh, M., & Pourhossein, R. (2017). Publishing in predatory open access journals: A case of Iran. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33, 433-444. DOI: 10.1007/s12109-017-9547-y
Ezema, I. J. (2011). Building open access institutional repositories for global visibility of Nigerian Scholarly Publication. Library Review, 60(6), 473-485. DOI:10.1108/00242531111147198
Fatahi Turki, S. (2013). Organizational diagnosis for the commercialization of the knowledge-based firms in the Science Parks [MSc. Thesis]. Tarbiat Modares University, Iran. (Persian)
Flowerdew, J.(1999). Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 123-145. DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80125-8
Fund, S. (2013). We need integrated publishing. Learned Publishing, 26(1), 57-64. DOI: 10.1087/20130111
Gasparyan, A. Y., Yessirkepov, M., Voronov, A. A., Gorin, S. V., Koroleva, A. M., & Kitas, G. D. (2016). Statement on publication ethics for editors and publishers. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(9), 1351-1354. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1351
Gazni, A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Didegah, F. (2012). Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 323-335. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21688
Ghazinouri, S. S., Malekifar, S., Ghaneirad, M. A., & Mousavi, A. (2018). A systematic pathology of cultural industries innovation system of the country: “ Institutional Mapping” and “ Stakeholder Analysis” Application. Strategy for Culture, 11(41), 7-44. (Persian) DOI:  10.22034/JSFC.2018.67055
Goldemberg, J. (1998). What is the role of science in developing countries? Science, 279(5354), 1140-1141. DOI: 10.1126/science.279.5354.1140
Haddawy, P., Hassan, S. U., Asghar, A., & Amin, S. (2016). A comprehensive examination of the relation of three citation-based journal metrics to expert judgment of journal quality. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 162-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.12.005
Hamrahi, A., Pournaghi, R., & Matlabi, D. (2023). Prioritization of indicators of the scholarly publication system in Iran. Library and Information Sciences, 25(4), 49-72. (Persian) DOI: 10.30481/lis.2022.366187.2019
Hesabi, F., Elahi, S., Hassanzadeh, M., & Shayan, A. (2021). Systematic pathology of the commercialization system of science and technology in Iran. Iranian Higher Education, 13(1), 140-172. (Persian)
Hine, Ch. (2006). New infrastructures for knowledge production: Understanding e-science. Pennsylvania: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-717-1
Islamic Parliament Research Center of The Islamic Republic of Iran. (2022 April 20). " Moving towards knowledge-based, job-creating production": Institutional pathology of science and technology commercialization system in Iran. Serial NO: 18178. Retrieved from: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1743202 (Persian)
Jalalizadeh, Z. (2016). The role of publisher in journals grade (Case study: University of Chicago Press, Oxford University Press, and University of Tehran Press). Environmental Management Hazards, 3(1), 61-73. (Persian) DOI: 10.22059/jhsci.2016.59275
Jones, N., Jones, H., & Walsh, C. (2008 August 19). Political Science? Strengthening science-policy dialogue in developing countries. ODI. Retrieved from: https://odi.org/en/publications/political-science-strengthening-sciencepolicy-dialogue-in-developing-countries/
Karami, E., & Ojaghi, R. (2015). Pathology of books from emergence to reading from the point of view of publishers. Kitab Mehr-Bahar, 19, 101-138. (Persian)
Kassouf, A., & Ronconi, L. (2022 January). Obstacles that southern researchers face in publishing in economics journals and why the research community should care [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the PEP Conference’s (Vol. 20). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/LucasRonconi/publication/358149125_Obstacles_that_Southern_Researchers_Face_in_Publishing_in_Economics_Journals_and_Why_the_Research_Community_Should_Care/links/61f2d7915779d35951da859d/Obstacles-that-Southern-Researchers-Face-in-Publishing-in-Economics-Journals-and-Why-the-Research-Community-Should-Care.pdf
Khoja, A., Kazim, F., & Ali, N. A. (2019). Barriers to conducting clinical trials in developing countries. Ochsner Journal, 19(4), 294-295. DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0068
Kulczycki, E., & Rozkosz, E. A. (2017). Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics, 111(1), 417-442. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2261-x
Kurpiela, S., & Teuteberg, F. (2022). Strategic planning of product-service systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338(1), 130528. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130528
Leão, D. (2015). Academic publishing in Portugal: threats and major opportunities. Insights the UKSG Journal, 28(1), 37-41. DOI: 10.1629/UKSG.179
Lei, J., & Jiang, T. (2019). Chinese university faculty’s motivation and language choice for scholarly publishing. Ibérica, (38), 51-74.
Li, J. (2021). The global ranking regime and the reconfiguration of higher education: Comparative case studies on research assessment exercises in China, Hong Kong, and Japan. In A. Welch (Ed.), Measuring Up in Higher Education: How University Rankings and League Tables are Re-shaping Knowledge Production in the Global Era (pp. 177-202). Singapore: Springer.
Lund, B. D. (2022). Is academic research and publishing still leaving developing countries behind? Accountability in Research, 29(4), 224-231. DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1913124
Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45-59.
Mathies, C., Kivistö, J., & Birnbaum, M. (2020). Following the money? Performance-based funding and the changing publication patterns of Finnish academics. Higher Education, 79(1), 21-37. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-019-00394-4
May, C. (2020). Academic publishing and open access: Costs, benefits, and options for publishing research. Politics, 40(1), 120-135. DOI: 10.1177/0263395719858571
Mirzaei, N. (2021). Pathology of cultural policies in the book publication in Qazvin province from 1988 to 1998 (M.A. Thesis). Payame Noor University of Qazvin, Iran. (Persian)
Modonesi, C., Farina, L., Licata, I., Germano, R., Zbilut, J. P., & Giuliani, A. (2008). A contemporary pathology of science. Annali Dell'istituto Superiore di Sanita, 44(3), 211-213.
Mohseni, H. S. (2017). Situation analysis of higher education regarding scientific cooperation in Iran. The Socio Cultural Strategy Journal, 6(22 ), 259-281. (Persian)
Nane, G. F., Robinson-Garcia, N., Van Schalkwyk, F., & Torres-Salinas, D. (2023). COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: Growth, open access and scientific fields. Scientometrics, 128(1), 345-362. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04536-x
Nasiripour, A. (2008) Pathology of scientific publications in the Seminary; Platforms & solutions. Information and Library Journal, 4(36), 26-49. (Persian)
Paleari, S., Donina, D., & Meoli, M. (2015). The role of the university in twenty-first century European society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 369-379. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-014-9348-9
Phan, T. (2018). Instructional strategies that respond to global learners' needs in massive open online courses. Online learning, 22(2), 95-118. DOI:10.24059/olj.v22i2.1160
Polonen, J.) 2018). Applications of, and experiences with, the Norwegian Model in Finland. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 31-44. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2018-0019
Puehringer, S., Rath, J., & Griesebner, T. (2021). Monopolies in science publishing: A black hole for public spending. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 24(6), 1-5.
Rezaian, M., Tavakol, M., & Nave Ebrahim, A. (2018). Challenges of non-profit, non-governmental universities and higher education institutions. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational Systems, 11(2(21)), 9-26. (Persian)
Rousseau-Hans, F., & Ollendorff, C. (2020). Publication and open access practices of French researchers in 2019. Consortium Couperin. Retrieved from: https://cea.hal.science/cea-02510332/
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121-132. DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009
Sawari, K., & Bahmani, S. (2010 December 22). Pathology of science production in educational institutions and centers of Iran. In National Research and Technology Management Conference. Tehran, Iran. (Persian)
Schneider, H., & Maleka, N. (2018). Patterns of authorship on community health workers in low-and-middle-income countries: An analysis of publications (2012-2016). BMJ Global Health, 3(3), e000797. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-00079
Sculean, A. (2020). Open access: The future of scientific publishing. Oral health & preventive dentistry. Retrieved from: https://boris.unibe.ch/148669/1/ohpd_2020_01_s0000.pdf
 Sharafi, M. (2021).The role of higher education centers in the production of science and knowledge [Paper presentation]. In National conference of professional research in psychology and counseling with the teacher's perspective approach. Minab, Iran. (Persian)
Shimray, S. R. (2023). Perceived attitudes, perceptions and barriers towards scholarly publication: A case study of Indian researchers. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 43(2), 88-93. DOI: 10.14429/djlit.43.2.18574
Siler, K. (2017). Future challenges and opportunities in academic publishing. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 42(1), 83-114. DOI:10.29173/cjs28140
Singhal, S., & Kalra, B. S. (2021). Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 40(1), 65-71. DOI: 10.1007/s12664-020-01129-5
Sivertsen, G. (2016). Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model. In: M. Ochsner, S. Hug, H. D. Daniel (Eds.), Research Assessment in the Humanities (pp. 70-91). Switzerland: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_7
Sivertsen, G. (2018). The Norwegian Model in Norway. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 2-18. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2018-0017
Smirnova, N. V., Lillis, T., & Hultgren, A. K. (2021). English and/or Russian medium publications? A case study exploring academic research writing in contemporary Russian academia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53(3), 101015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101015 
Sultan Mohammadi, A.(2014). Electronic publishing infrastructure factors in Iran [M.A. Thesis]. Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran. (Persian)
Taqizadeh Kerman, N., Gholi Zadeh, R., Javidi Kalateh Jafarabadi, H. & Javidi Kalateh Jafarabadi, T. (2015). A pathological study of knowledge creation in humanities research centers. Strategy for Culture, 8(30), 161-188. (Persian)
Tracz, V., & Lawrence, R. (2016). Towards an open science publishing platform. F1000Research, 5, 130-139. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7968.1
Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., & Warner, S. (2004). Rethinking scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9), 1082-9873. DOI:10.1045/september2004-vandesompel
Verleysen, F. T., Ghesquière, P. & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW). In W. Blockmans, L. Engwall, D. Weaire (Eds.), The use and abuse of bibliometrics (pp. 115-125). Academiae Europaea; Portland Press.
Wright, K. (2021). The case for a technology solution to the ethics crisis in academic publishing. International Journal of Technoethics, 12(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.4018/IJT.2021010101
Yoon, S. W., Han, H., Han, C. S. H., & Chai, D. S. (2021). The power of ethics and standards when the scholarly system fails. Human Resource Development Review, 20(2), 136-142. DOI: 10.1177/15344843211006795
Zerehsaz, M. (2011). Scientific communication as an information system: The open access movement and paradigm shifts. Shamseh: Electronic publication of the Organization of Libraries, Museums and Documents Center of Astan-e Quds-e Razavi, 3(12-13), 1-17. (Persian)
 
 
 
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار