تحلیلی بر استراتژی‌های سازما‌‌‌ن‌های پژوهش و فناوری در اتحادیه اروپا

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیات علمی پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوریهای نوین، سازمان پژوهش های علمی و صنعتی ایران

2 هیئت علمی پژوهشکده مطالعات فناوری‌های نوین، سازمان پژوهش‌های علمی و صنعتی ایران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری با هدف تحقیق و توسعه و با رویکردهای مختلفی در کشورها ایجاد شده‌اند و نقش حلقه واسط بین دانشگاه، صنعت و دولت را ایفا ‌می‌کنند. سابقه این سازمان‌ها به اوایل قرن بیستم باز‌‌می‌گردد که به منظور حمایت از صنایع تشکیل شده‌اند. امروزه سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری هر کدام بسته به شرایط کشورشان و یا منطقه، مأموریت‌ها و سیاست‌های متفاوتی در تحقق اهداف خود به کار می‌گیرند. این مقاله تلاش دارد به بررسی و تحلیل سیاست‌های سازمان‌های پژوهش و فناوری در سایر کشورها و به ویژه در اتحادیه اروپا بپردازد. در این راستا، رویکردهای مختلف از منظر نوآوری، صنعت، دولت، و شاخص‌های عملکردی در حوزه اتحادیه اروپا مورد مطالعه و بررسی قرار گرفته است. روش مورد استفاده در این پژوهش توصیفی، تحلیلی است. گردآوری داده‌ها مبتنی بر پژوهش‌های منتشر شده و کتابخانه‌ای است، که در آن رویکردها و سیاست‌ها در سایر مؤسسه‌های پژوهشی، صنایع و دانشگاه‌ها مقایسه شده است. شاخص‌های به کار گرفته شده، رویکردهای نوآوری و انواع آنها تجزیه‌وتحلیل و به صورت دسته‌بندی جدیدی ساختاردهی شده است. در نهایت، در بخش تحلیل نتایج، جمع‌بندی جدید سیاستی در چهار رویکرد، دولت‌محور، صنعت‌محور، نوآورانه و آینده‌نگر ارائه شده است و سپس، مقایسه تحلیلی برای سازمان‌های پژوهشی کشور ارائه شده است

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Research and Technology Organizations’ Strategies in European Union

نویسندگان [English]

  • Negar Armaghan 1
  • Negin Fallah Haghighi 2
1 Department of Technology Development Studies, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST), Tehran-Iran
2 Department of Technology Development Studies, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Research and Technology Organizations have been established with different approaches in several countries. They have as an intermediary link among industry, government and university. The history of these organizations back to the beginning of twentieth century, that their objective was supporting industries. Nowadays, Research and Technology Organizations use different missions and strategies depending on the circumstances of their country or region. This paper tries to analyze the strategies of research and technology organizations in European Union countries. In this regard, various approaches from the point of view of innovation, industry, government, and performance indicators in other areas have been mainly studied in the EU. The research methodology is descriptive and analytic. The data collections are based on documental study, published and library research. These indicators and the innovation approaches are analyzed, structured and proposed as a new category at the end of this paper. Finally, in the results analysis section, a new strategy summary is presented in four approaches, government-oriented, industry-based, innovative and foresight base. An analytical comparison for the Iran’s research organizations is presented comparing to the current existing approaches

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Research and Technology Organizations
  • Industry
  • Innovation
  • Strategy

مراجع

 
[1]  OECD. Benchmarkimg Industry-Science Relations. OECD: Paris. 2002.
[2]  Mrinalini, N. and Nath P., Knowledge Management in Research and Technology Organizations in a Globalized Era. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology. 2008, 7 (1). 37-54.
[3]  Gulbrandsen, Research Institutes as hybrid organizations: central challenges to their legitimacy. Policy Sci, 2011; 44: 215–230.
[4]  Ansari, R., Sultanzadeh, J. A Comparative Study of Select Research and Technology Organizations and Some Lessons for Iran. 2013; 6 (21): 173-205.
[5]  Rush H., Howard R., Technology institutes: strategies for best practice (1996) Vaezzadeh S, University of Tehran, 1381.
[6]  Arnold, E., Brown, N., Eriksson, A., Jansson, T., Muscio, A., Nählinder, J., Zaman, R., The role of industrial research institutes in the national innovation systems, VINNOVA, 2007; 1–194.
[7]  EURAB. Research and Technology Organizations (RTO) and ERA. European Research Advisory Board, 2005; 1-23 in Kazazi, A., Tabatabian, S., Tayebi, H., Ansari, R. Organizational Culture and Success in Jahad Daneshgahi. (Persian). 2009; 2 (7): 75-101.
[8]  Readman, J., Bessant, J., Neely, A., Twigg, D., Positioning UK research and technology organizations as outward facing technology bases. RD Management (special issue), 2015
[9]  Giannopoulou, E., Barlatier P-J., Pénin J. Same but Different? Reseaech and Technology organizations, universities and the innovation activities firms, Research Policy, Elsevier, 2019; 48: 223-233.
[10]  Rothwell, R., Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990s. R&D Management. 1992, 22 (3). 221-240.
[11]  Intarakumnerd, P. and Chairatana, P.A., Shifting S&T Policy Paradaim: an Experience of an RTO in Thailand. International Journal of Technology and Globalization. 2008, 4 (2): 121-138.
[12]  Arnold, E.; Rush, H.; Bessant, J. and Hobday, M. Strategic Planning in Research and Technology Institutes. R&D Management, 1998; 28 (2): 89-100
[13]  Intrarakumnerd, P., and Goto A., Role of public research institutes in national innovation systèms in industrialized countries: the cases of Fraunhofer, NIST, CSIRO, AIST, and ITRI, Reseach Policy, Elsevier, 2018, 47, 1309-1320
[14]  Comin, D., Licht G., Pallens M., Schubert T., Do companies benefit frm public research organization? The impact of Fraunhofer Society in Germany, ZEW Discussion Papers, 2019, 19-006, ZEW-Leibniz-Zentrum fur Euripaische Wirtschaftsforshung, Manheim
[15]  Ziaei, M., Knowledge, innovation and knowledge-based development: the role of research and technology organizations, Minstry of Agriculture-Jahad Department Engineering, 1389
[16]  Brockhoff, K., Exploring Strategic R&D Success Factors, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2003; 15 (3): 333-348 In Ansari, R., Sultanzadeh, J., A Comparative Study of Select Research and Technology Organizations and Some Lessons for Iran. (Persian). 2013; 6 (21): 173-205.
[17]  Modrego-Rico, A., Barge-Gil, A., Núñez-Sánchez, R., Service supply characteristics developing indicators to measure technology institutes’ performance. Res. Eval. 2005; 14 (10): 177–184.
[18]  Leitner, K.H. Managing and reporting intangible assets in RTOs, R&D Management, 2005; 35 (2): 125-136.
[19]  Arundel, A. and Hollanders, H. Innovation Scoreboards: Indicators and Policy Use", in C. Nauwelaers and R. Wintjes (Eds.). Innovation Policy in Europe, Edward Elgar, 2008: Cheltenham.
[20]  Arnold, E., Clark, J., Javorka, Z., Impacts of European RTOs. A Study of Social and Economic Impacts of Research and Technology Organizations. Technopolis group, 2010.
[21]  Augusto C., Diaz R., Research and technology organizations’ mobilizers of the regional environment, European Journal of Management and Business Economics, Emerland Publishing Limited, 2019; 26 (2): 180-198. DOI 10.1108/EJMBE-07-2017-011
[22]  Vivas, C., Barge-Gil, A., Impact on firms of the use of knowledge external sources: a systematic review of the literature. J. Econ. Surv. 2015; 29 (5): 943–964.
[23]  Faems, D., Van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Interorganizational collaboration and Innovation: toward a portfolio approach. J. Prod. Innov. Management, 2005; 22: 238–250.
[24]  Albors-Garrigos, J., Zabaleta, N., Ganzarain, and J., New R&D management paradigms: rethinking research and technology organizations strategies in regions. R D Manag, 2010; 40 (5): 435–454.
[25]  Garrigos, J. A., Rincon, C., Research Technology Organisations as leaders of R&D collaboration with SMEs: Role, Barriers and Facilitators, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Routledge, 2013, ISSN 1465-3990.
[26]  Castro, L.M., and Mota, J., Technological Centers as a Negotiated Context to Combine Technological Capabilities. Group Decis Negot, 2009, 18: 467–482.
[27]  Raghuvanshi, J., Agrawal, R., and Ghosh, P. K., Measuring the innovation capability of mico entreprises in India, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2019, 25 (5), 1405-1430; Emerland Publishing limited, DOI 10.1108/BIJ-08-2018-0229.
[28]  Masa’deh, R., Al-Henzab, J., Tarhini, A., and Obeidar, B., The associations among market orientation, technology orientation, entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2018, 25 (8), 3117-3142. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-02-2017-0024.
[29]  Bell, S., Organizational resilience: a matter of organizational lide and death, Continuity & Resilience Review, Emerald Publishing Li;ited, 2019, 1(1), 5-16, DOI 10.1108/CRR-01-2019-0002.
[30]  Martiez-Vela, C., Benchmarking Research and Technology Organizations (RTOs): A Comparative Analysis. MIT Industrial Performance Center. 2016.
[31]  Aström, T., Eriksson, M. L., Arnold, E., International Comparison of Five Institute Systems. Forsknings-og Innovationsstyrelsen. Copenhagen: 2008.
[32]  Charles, D., Ciampi Stancova, K., Research and technology Organisations and Smart Specalisation, JRC Technical Reports, European Commisssion, 2015;15.
 
 

فایل ها

همرسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار