[1] Freeman C. The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technological forecasting and social change. 1996 Sep 1; 53 (1): 27-39.
[2] Smelser NJ, Swedberg R. The Handbook of Economic Sociology.
[3] Godin B. The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2006 Nov; 31 (6): 639-67.
[4] Edgerton D. The Linear Model. Did not exist. Reflections on the history and historiography of science and research in industry in the twentieth century. In The science-industry nexus. History, policy, implications, eds. Karl Grandin, Nina Wormbs, and Sven Widmalm. 2004: 31-57.
[5] Hounshell, D. In: Grandin, K., Worms, N., Widmalm, S. (Eds.), Industrial Research, Commentary. Science History Publications, Sagamore Beach, 2004; 59–65.
[6] Godin B. In the shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the study of technological innovation. Minerva. 2008 Sep 1; 46 (3): 343-60.
[7] Godin B. Innovation: the history of a category, project on the intellectual history of innovation. Montreal: INRS.
1. Free basic research
[8] Godin B. The linear model of innovation: Maurice Holland and the research cycle. Social Science Information. 2011 Sep; 50 (3-4): 569-81.
[9] Mees CE. The organization of industrial scientific research. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Incorporated; 1920.
[10] Industrial Research Institute (New York. Research in industry: Its organization and management. D. Van Nostrand Company; 1948.
[11] Price WJ, Bass LW. Scientific research and the innovative process. Science. 1969 May 16;164 (3881):
802-6.
[12] Langnsh J. Wealth from Knowledge: A Study of Innovation in Industry.
[13] Stokes D. Completing the Bush model: Pasteur’s Quadrant. In: Science the Endless Frontier: Learning from the Past, Designing for the Future. High- lights from the Conference Series, 1995; 23–35, www.cspo.org/ourlibrary/documents/bushconfhighlights.pdf.
[14] Stokes DE. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation.
[15] Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management science. 2002 Jan; 48 (1): 1-23.
[16] Bush, V., 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President. United States Government Printing Office, July, Washington DC. Found at: www.nsf.gov/about/history/vbush 1945.htm (last accessed: May 16, 2008 – 9.50 am).
[17] Maclaurin WR, Harman RJ. Invention & innovation in the radio industry. Macmillan; 1949.
[18] Maclaurin WR. The process of technological innovation: The launching of a new scientific industry. The American Economic Review. 1950 Mar 1; 40 (1): 90-112.
[19] Maclaurin WR. Federal support for scientific research. Harvard Business Review. 1947 Mar 1; 25 (3):
385-96.
[20] Maclaurin WR. The sequence from invention to innovation and its relation to economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1953 Feb 1; 67 (1): 97-111.
[21] Maclaurin WR. Technological progress in some American industries. The American Economic Review. 1954 May 1; 44 (2): 178-89.
[22] Stevens R. A report on industrial research as a National Resource: Introduction. National Research Council, Research: A National Resource (II): Industrial Research, Washington: National Resources Planning Board. 1941: 5-16.
[23] Rosenberg N. Perspectives on technology. CUP Archive; 1976 Jul 30.
[24] Rosenberg N, Nathan R. Inside the black box: technology and economics. cambridge university press; 1982.
[25] Rosenberg N, Nelson RR. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research policy. 1994 May 1; 23 (3): 323-48.
[26] Nelson RR, Rosenberg N. Science, technological advance and economic growth. The dynamic firm, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1998: 45-59.
[27] Kline SJ. Innovation is not a linear process. Research management. 1985 Jul 1; 28 (4): 36-45.
[28] Kline SJ. An Overview of Innovation. Landau R., Rosenberg N., Eds. The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. 1986.
[29] Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research policy. 1991 Feb 1; 20 (1): 1-2.
[30] Klevorick AK, Levin R, Nelson R, Winter S. On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24 (2).
[31] Pavitt K, Sussex Univ., Brighton (United Kingdom). Science Policy Research Unit; ESRC Centre on Science, Technology, Energy and Environment Policy (STEEP), Brighton (United Kingdom); Academic research, technical change and government policy.
[32] Sequeira K, Martin B. The links between university physics and industry, science policy. Report to the Institute of Physics Research Unit, University of Sussex. 1996.
[33] Gilfillan SC. The Sociology of Invention: An Essay in the Social Causes of Technic Invention and Some of its Social Results (Chicago: Follet).
[34] Hippel E. VON (1988), The Sources of Innovation. New York. 1988.
[35] Lüthje C, Herstatt C, Von Hippel E. User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. Research policy. 2005 Aug 1; 34 (6): 951-65.
[36] Nelson R. The link between science and invention: The case of the transistor. InThe rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors 1962 Jan 1 (549-584). Princeton University Press.
[37] Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of economic literature. 1988 Sep 1: 1120-71.
[38] Bonaccorsi A, Thoma G. Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology. Research policy. 2007 Jul 1; 36 (6): 813-31.
[39] Nelson RR. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of political economy. 1959 Jun 1;67 (3): 297-306.
[40] Mowery DC, Rosenberg N. Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America.
[41] Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy. 1982 Jun 1; 11 (3): 147-62.
[42] Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations.
[43] Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The future location of research and technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 1999 Aug 1; 24 (2-3): 111-23.
[44] Gibbons M, editor. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage; 1994 Sep 9.
[45] Orsenigo L, Pammolli F, Riccaboni M. Technological change and network dynamics: lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. Research policy. 2001 Mar 1; 30 (3): 485-508.
[46] Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Technology, Management and Systems of Innovation. 1984: 15-45.
[47] Galambos L. Innovation and industry evolution: a comment. In knowledge accumulation and industry evolution. The case of pharmabiotech. Edited by Mazzucato, M. and Dosi, G.
[48] Grabowski H, Vernon J. The determinants of pharmaceutical research and development expenditures. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2000 Jan 1; 10 (1-2): 201-15.
[49] Balconi M, Laboranti A. University–industry interactions in applied research: The case of microelectronics. Research Policy. 2006 Dec 1; 35 (10): 1616-30.
[50] Kealey T, Nelson RR. The economic laws of scientific research. London: Macmillan; 1996 Jan.
[51] Nelson RR. The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research policy. 2004 Apr 1; 33 (3):
455-71.
[52] Dosi G, Llerena P, Labini MS. The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Research policy. 2006 Dec 1; 35 (10): 1450-64.
[53] Mazzoleni R, Nelson RR. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate. Research policy. 1998 Jul 1; 27 (3): 273-84.
[54] David PA, Hall BH. Property and the Pursuit of Knowledge: IPR Issues Affecting Scientific Research. Research Policy. 2006 Jan 1; 35 (6).
[55] David P, Foray D. W. Steinmueller, The research network and the new economics of science: from metaphors to organisational behaviour.
[56] Caracostas P. The policy-shaper’s anxiety at the innovation kick: how far do innovation theories really help in the world of policy? Perspectives on innovation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 2007: 464-89.
)