ارائه چارچوبی جهت استقرار اثربخش نظام مدیریت دانش در سازمان با رویکرد فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دکترای تخصصی مدیریت دولتی، موسسه آموزش عالی میزان، تبریز، ایران

چکیده

استقرار نظام مدیریت دانش یکی از مهم‏ترین و حیاتی‏ ترین عوامل موفقیت سازمان‏ها در شرایط رقابتی و عصر اطلاعاتی است. بنابراین هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائة چارچوبی برای استقرار اثربخش نظام مدیریت دانش در سازمان با رویکرد فراترکیب است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی است که با روش کیفی از نوع اسنادی و فراترکیب انجام شده است. برای تحلیل منابع اطلاعاتی مختلف از روش هفت مرحله‏ای سندلوسکی و باروسو استفاده شده است. جامعة مطالعه شامل 322 ‏پژوهش کیفی (مرتبط‏ ترین مطالعات) پژوهش‏ های پیشین (مقاله‏ ها، طرح ‏ها و پایان‏ نامه ‏ها) در زمینة استقرار نظام مدیریت دانش است که با استفاده از رویکرد نمونه‏ گیری هدفمند برای تحلیل انتخاب شدند و در نهایت 182 پژوهش برای فراترکیب انتخاب و با تحلیل محتوای آنها ابعاد و کدهای مربوط استخراج شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات از روش دستی و برای کدگذاری مؤلفه ‏ها از نرم‏افزار اطلس تی8[1] استفاده شد. یافته ‏های پژوهش نشان داد که عوامل بنیادی دانش (رویکرد دانش‏افزایی، رویکرد دانش جمعی یا گروهی و رویکرد دانش‏ بنیان)، عوامل فرایندی دانش (درونی ‏سازی دانش صریح به ضمنی، برونی‏ سازی دانش ضمنی به صریح و ترکیب دانش صریح با صریح) و عوامل زمینه ‏ای دانش (ابزار دانش، ساختار دانش، شبکه دانش) برای استقرار نظام مدیریت دانش در سازمان مؤثرند.
 
[1]. Atlas T8
 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Developing a Framework for the Effective Implementation of the Knowledge Management Systems in the Organization with a Hybrid Approach

نویسنده [English]

  • Javad Moghtader kargaran
PhD in Public Administration, Mizan Institute of Higher Education, Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Knowledge management plays a significant role in organizations, and one of its most important roles is to support organizations to effectively deal with changes, increase productivity, and pave the way for development and innovation. The creation, transfer and application of knowledge in an organization is supported by a knowledge management system. Nowadays, attention to knowledge and knowledge management as a strategic asset has been given a lot of attention. Facing the fading knowledge economy, knowing how to effectively manage and integrate different types of knowledge (explicit-implicit) has become very vital to maintain and create a competitive advantage. Knowledge is a valuable, scarce and irreplaceable resource that gives an organization a sustainable competitive advantage. For decades now, organizations have been actively engaged in knowledge management in hopes of improving performance. Although in knowledge management in general, theories are either human-centered or system-centered (technology-centered). In the broadest sense, knowledge management is defined as the ability to use knowledge to achieve organizational goals, which includes how to collect, store, transfer, apply, update and create knowledge. Establishing knowledge management systems is one of the most vital success factors of organizations in today’s competitive conditions and information age. The current research aims to provide a framework for the effective establishment of a knowledge management system in the organization with a meta-composite approach, which is a qualitative method of document type, meta-composition and meta-analysis in terms of practical purpose and terms of nature The steps of this research were based on the seven-step method of Sandelowski and Barroso. The scope of the study includes previous researches (articles, projects, theses) in the field of knowledge management systems, and the most relevant studies were selected using a targeted approach in the field of sampling. In the surveys conducted in this field, researches were selected in which the establishment of a knowledge management system was discussed directly and also in the context of other variables. In this regard, 322 qualitative researches were evaluated in the field of knowledge management systems, at the end of which 182 researches were selected and the relevant dimensions and codes were extracted by analyzing their content. For data analysis, the manual method and Atlas T8 software were used for research coding. Based on the findings of the research based on prioritization, a model based on structural factors (development-oriented approach, teamwork approach, and knowledge-based approach), process factors (explicit to implicit internalization, implicit to explicit knowledge externalization and explicit to explicit knowledge combination) and background factors. (hardware, software and knowledge repositories and network) was presented. The review and generality of the conceptual model has reached the consensus of the experts and a suitable model has been identified for the investigation of factors affecting the effective establishment of knowledge management.
According to the results of the research, the following executive and organizational suggestions are proposed:

Managers of the organization should provide an environment for employees so that employees can take advantage of learning opportunities in gatherings, meetings, lectures and meetings to convert tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge.
By creating motivational policies, the managers of the company should create a mechanism so that the knowledge of people before leaving the organization is obtained from them in writing in any way possible and stored in the organizational database. At the same time, mutual development and synergy in the work of employees will also occur.
Tools and technologies should be developed, firstly, the knowledge evaluation system is created, and secondly, knowledge users can use the evaluated organizational knowledge to solve organizational problems.

Formation of scientific or professional associations (groups of engineers, researchers, etc.) to produce and share professional knowledge. To make these associations more effective, material and spiritual support should be provided for their activities and qualified people should be allowed to attend the associations

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • knowledge
  • effective
  • knowledge management
  • implementation of knowledge management
  • effective implementation of knowledge management
Agrawal, A., & Mukti, S. K. (2020). Knowledge management & It's origin, success factors, planning, tools, applications, barriers and enablers: A review. International Journal of Knowledge Management16(1), 43-82.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107-136.
Azar, A., & Momeny, M. (2008). Statistics and its application in management (statistical analysis). Tehran: SAMT publication. (Persian)
Boonchan, G., Sinthamrongruk, T., & Khamaksorn, A. (2022, January). Knowledge management in the Royal Thai Army: ISO30401: 2018 knowledge management systems perspective [Conference presentation]. In 2022 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON). Thailand.
Brady, T., & Davies, A. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies25(9), 1601-21.
Brookes, N. J., Morton, S. C., Dainty, A. R. J., & Burns, N. D. (2006). Social processes, patterns and practices and project knowledge management: A theoretical framework and an empirical investigation. International Journal of Project Management24(6), 474-82.
Chen, C. J., Huang, J. W., & Hsiao, Y. C. (2010). Knowledge management and innovativeness: The role of organizational climate and structure. International Journal of Manpower31(8), 848-70.
Choi, Y. S. (2000). An empirical study of factors affecting successful implementation of knowledge management. Nebraska: University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Chourides, P., Longbottom, D., & Murphy, W. (2003). Excellence in knowledge management: An empirical study to identify critical factors and performance measures. Measuring business excellence7(2), 29-45.
Collison, C. J., Corney, P. J., & Eng, P. L. (2019). The KM cookbook: Stories and strategies for organisations exploring knowledge management standard ISO30401. London: Facet Publishing.
Cross, R., & Baird, L. (2000). Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory. MIT Sloan Management Review41(3), 69-78.
Dehghani, M., Yaghobi, N., Mooghali, A., & Vazifeh, Z. (2015). A three-layer pattern for Feasibility and establishment of knowledge management by Meta-Synthesis Method (Integrated Approach). Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management3(4), 93-107. (Persian)
Fey, C. F., & Furu, P. (2008). Top management incentive compensation and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal29(12), 1301-23.
Forcadell, F. J., & Guadamillas, F. (2002). A case study on the implementation of a knowledge management strategy oriented to innovation. Knowledge and Process Management9(3), 162-71.
Hasanali, F. (2003, November 20). Critical Success Factors of Knowledge Management. Retrieved from: www.kmadvantage.com/docs/km_articles/Critical Success Factors of KM. pdf (Persian)
Hassanzadeh, M. (2009). Knowledge management: Concepts and infrastructures. Tehran: Ketabdar. (Persian)
Hassanzadeh, M. (2020). Establishing effective knowledge management in Iranian organizations: Barriers that need to be overcome. Sciences and Techniques of Information Management6(4), 7-14. (Persian)
Heisig, P. (2003). Business process oriented knowledge management. In Knowledge management: Concepts and best practices (pp. 15-44). Heidelberg: Springer.
Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2000). An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2-3), 235-61.
Huang, J. C., & Newell, S. (2003). Knowledge integration processes and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. International Journal of Project Management21(3), 167-76.
Hung, Y. C., Huang, S. M., Lin, Q. P., & ‐Tsai, M. L. (2005). Critical factors in adopting a knowledge management system for the pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems105(2), 164-83.
Jafari, S. M., Shami Zanjani, M., & Yekkeh, H. (2020). A framework for identifying knowledge management advantages based on Meta-synthesis Method. Management and Development Process32(4), 119-52.
Jones, H., Jones, N. A., Shaxson, L., & Walker, D. (2012). Navigating the knowledge–policy landscape. In Knowledge, Policy and Power in International Development (pp. 1-12). Bristol: Policy Press.
Kachra, A., & White, R. E. (2008). Know‐how transfer: The role of social, economic/competitive, and firm boundary factors. Strategic Management Journal29(4), 425-45.
Kelly, P. R. (2018). An activity theory study of data, knowledge, and power in the design of an international development NGO impact evaluation. Information Systems Journal28(3), 465-88.
Kemp, J., Pudlatz, M., Perez, P., & Ortega, A. M. (2001). KM technologies and tools. England: European KM Forum consortium.
Khalifa, M., & Liu, V. (2003). Determinants of successful knowledge management programs. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management1(2), 101-10.
Koskinen, K. U. (2003). Evaluation of tacit knowledge utilization in work units. Journal Of Knowledge Management7(5), 67-81.
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems20(1), 179-228.
Mason, M., Crossley, M., & Bond, T. (2019). Changing modalities in international development and research in education: Conceptual and ethical issues. International Journal of Educational Development70, 102080.
McAdam, R., & McCreedy, S. (1999). A critical review of knowledge management models. The Learning Organization6(3), 91-101.
Meyer, M., & Zack, M. (1996). The design and implementation of information product. Sloan Management Review37(3), 43-59.
Mikovic, R. (2019). Integrated model of knowledge management based on social capital of the organization(doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Moffett, S., McAdam, R., & Parkinson, S. (2002). Developing a model for technology and cultural factors in knowledge management: a factor analysis. Knowledge and Process Management9(4), 237-55.
Mohaghar, A., Jabbarzadeh, Y., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., & Mokhtarzadeh, N. (2013). Analysing Iranian industry behavior by using dynamic Systems Modeling. Industrial Management Studies, 11(28), 1-19. (Persian)
Müller, R., & Turner, J. R. (2007). Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. International Journal of Project Management25(1), 21-32.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science5(1), 14-37.
Rašula, J., Bosilj Vukšić, V., & Indihar Štemberger, M. (2008). The integrated knowledge Management Maturity Model. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business11(2), 47-62.
Ronaghi, M. H., Zeinodinzadeh, S., & Alambeladi, S. (2019). Identification and ranking the factors affecting the knowledge management implementation using Metasynthesis Method. Library and Information Sciences, 22(3), 112-35. (Persian)
Rubenstein-Montano, B., Buchwalter, J., & Liebowitz, J. (2001). Knowledge management: A US social security administration case study. Government Information Quarterly18(3), 223-53.
Sadri, A. (2018). Institutionalizing of knowledge management in Iranian universities. Journal of Research in Educational Science12(43), 41-63. (Persian)
Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management17(3-4), 299-319.
Snyman, R., & Kruger, C. J. (2004). The interdependency between strategic management and strategic knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management8(1), 5-19.
Stankosky, M. and Baldanza, C., A System Approach to Engineering a Knowledge Management System, In R. C., Barquin, A., Bennet, & S. G., Remez (Eds.). Knowledge management: The Catalyst for Electronic Government (p. 137). Vienna: Management Concepts.
Steele, N. O. (2000). Success factors for virtual libraries. Econtent23(5), 68-71.
Sunassee, N. N., & Sewry, D. A. (2003, September). An investigation of knowledge management implementation strategies [Conference presentation]. In Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Research Conference of The South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on Enablement Through Technology (pp. 24-36). Johannesburg, south Africa.
Tabarsa, G. A., & Ormazdi, N. (2008). Explanation and evaluation of basic factors for creating knowledge management in N. LO. DC. Journal of Business Management, 7(1), 1-39. (Persian)
Taylor Small, C., & Taattalias, J. (2000, April 28). Knowledge management model guides KM process. Retrieved from: http://www.mitre.org/pubs/edge/april_00.htm
Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review40(3), 55-79.
Wang, Z., Wang, N., Su, X., & Ge, S. (2020). An empirical study on business analytics affordances enhancing the management of cloud computing data security. International Journal of Information Management50, 387-94.
Williams, C. (2007). Transfer in context: Replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships. Strategic Management Journal28(9), 867-89.
Yang, L. R., Huang, C. F., & Hsu, T. J. (2014). Knowledge leadership to improve project and organizational performance. International Journal of Project Management32(1), 40-53.