اندازه گیری سواد علمی ایرانیان در دو بعد شناختی و رفتاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار علوم سیاسی، گروه مطالعات آینده علم و فناوری، موسسه تحقیقات سیاست علمی کشور

2 دانشیار، گروه ارتباطات علم و فناوری، پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات،پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

سواد علمی مفهوم با سابقه  ‌ای است و علاوه بر حوزه آموزش علوم در حوزه ارتباطات علم و سیاست­گذاری علم و فناوری نیز موضوع مهمی به شمار می رود. اهمیت سواد علمی از اینجا ناشی می شود که جوامع امروزی هر چه بیشتر علمی و فناورانه می شوند و علم و فناوری در همه ابعاد زندگی از خوردن تا اوقات فراغت و تا اشتغال و دیپلماسی را دربرگرفته است.  از این رو، مهم است که شهروندان واجد سواد علمی باشند. سواد علمی وضعیت و سطح دانش علمی در مواضع مختلف زندگی انسان را نشان می دهد. این مقاله قصد دارد تا سواد علمی شهروندان بالای 18 سال ایرانی را که به اینترنت دسترسی دارند و واجد پست الکترونیکی هستند، مطالعه کند. ابزار گردآوری داده ها، پرسشنامه ای است که دو بعد سواد علمی را با 18 سوال مورد سنجش قرار می دهد. جمعیت مورد مطالعه، تمام ایرانیانی هستند که بالای 18 سال سن دارند و به اینترنت دسترسی دارند. با توجه به این که این مطالعه از پیمایش برخط استفاده کرده است، روش نمونه گیری تصادفی غیرفهرستی به کار گرفته شده است. تعداد 498 نفر پرسشنامه را تکمیل کردند که 461 پرسشنامه صحیح و کامل بودند و برای تحلیل انتخاب شدند. نتایج نشان می دهد که سواد علمی در بین ایرانیان بیش از متوسط است. همچنین، این مطالعه نشان داد که محتوای علمی در رسانه های اجتماعی نقش مهمی در افزایش سواد علمی کارکردی دارد. این پژوهش پیشنهاد می کند که سیاست گذاران و نهادهای مرتبط از نتایج این پژوهش استفاده کنند و پیمایش های منظمی برای اندازه گیری سواد علمی ایرانیان را برنامه ریزی کنند. بدیهی است که نتایج این پیمایش موجب درک بهتر بافتار اجتماعی ایران و دستیابی به راهکارهای درست برای حل مسائل علمی و آموزشی می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Measuring the scientific literacy of Iranians with access to the Internet in two cognitive and behavioral dimensions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akram Ghadimi 1
  • zahra ojagh 2
1 Phd in Political Science, Associate Prof., Department of Future Study of Science and Technology, National Research Institute for Science Policy
2 Phd in Social Communication Studies, Associate Prof., Department of Communication of Science and Technology, Faculty of Cultural Studies and Communication, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

This paper aimed to measure scientific literacy among Iranian citizens with Internet access. The term scientific literacy was noticed in the 1950s; when the Second World War finished and the space race started.  Scientific literacy is important for living in contemporary knowledge-based societies. It is a continuum from nominal, functional, and conceptual-procedural to multi-dimensional literacy. This indicates that science literacy is more than just writing and reading; it deals with everyday life and social acting in the VUCA world. Since it is a vague concept, many studies try to define scientific literacy. Many studies strive to assess the level of individuals from different groups, nationalities, or comparative. To define the concept of scientific literacy, researchers show different aspects of scientific literacy such as the nature of scientific literacy; Using the scientific process for problem solving, decision making, and understanding the world; lifelong learning; and appreciating science and technology and their relation to society. Generally, these researches indicate that the interactions between three parts of science-technology-society are the main indicator of scientific literacy. The mentioned dimensions and levels indicate that a scientifically literate person should have attitudinal, social and interdisciplinary characteristics with each other, plus intellectual and cognitive capacity. It must be said that knowing basic science facts is only a small part of the components of scientific literacy, however, it is critical and forms the basic level of literacy. This is the first phase of understanding science-related issues and solving them and it is called nominal scientific literacy. Previous studies in Iran demonstrated that a comprehensive and national survey of public scientific literacy in Iran is needed.
This research includes two parts: first, it constructed and verified a questionnaire that is the assessment tool. Second, measuring public scientific literacy by that questionnaire. A qualitative approach and documentary analysis are used to construct and validate the questionnaire which includes various items and dimensions. To receive advice and opinions from experts and professors, a preliminary questionnaire was sent to them, and received their expert opinions. After applying comments, the questionnaire was revised and this process was repeated. Finally, the questionnaire related to scientific literacy with the number of 18 questions was finalized. The format of questions was Likert scale and yes/no questions. Using the Coefficient of Variation Ratio (CVR) and Cronbach’s alpha, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire were assessed. In most studies, public scientific literacy has been measured based on dimensions such as cognition, behavior, attitude, evaluation and knowledge. However in this questionnaire, only two dimensions of cognition and behavior were studied, the first one representing nominal literacy and the other representing functional literacy.
The data collection tool was a validated questionnaire that assessed two dimensions of science literacy with 18 questions. The study's statistical population included all the citizens of Iran over 18 years of age who have access to the Internet. Since this study used an online survey, the non-list-based random sampling method was utilized. 498 completed questionnaires were received, of which 461 were correct and complete and therefore were selected. Data was entered into SPSS software and analyzed using a one sample t-test and Friedman test.
Based on findings 62.4 percent of respondents are female and the number of male participants was 37.6 percent. Most of them were literate scientifically, probably because 89 percent were educated at university, more or less. Data show that the memorization level of respondents was high and this is significant; because memorization can play an important role in learning, no matter people's age. Thus memorization of scientific data is one of the first steps for increasing and promoting levels of scientific literacy. Also, more than 70 percent of participants have participated in a scientific activity during the last six months. Most of them like to use social media to attend a virtual meeting or lecture; and the least go to the museums or are present in a real scientific event. It may be said that they prefer activities that don’t need any movement and transportation.
The results showed that the scientific literacy among the Iranian citizens was above average. Also, this study showed that scientific content in social media played a significant role in increasing functional science literacy. Also, there is a relationship between the coverage of different topics by media and the individual's knowledge about them. This study indicates that the memorization level of literacy is high which is a critical point. Since it is not enough but necessary to memorize for achieving to upper level of scientific literacy. This is because nominal scientific literacy plays a small role in the public understanding of the nature and process of science, and for decision-making, based on previous studies. This research suggests that policymakers and related institutions use the results of this research and plan regular surveys to measure the scientific literacy of Iranians. Such surveys result in a better understanding of the Iranian social context and true solutions for solving scientific and educational problems in the country.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Scientific Literacy
  • Assessment
  • Cognitive dimension
  • Behavioral dimension
  • Online survey
Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35-54. DOI: 11.1077/0963662506070159
Besson, S. (2024). The ‘Human Right to Science’ qua right to participate in science - The participatory good of science and its human rights dimensions. The International Journal of Human Rights, 28(4), 497-528. DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2023.2251897
Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes to Practices. New Hampshire: Heinemann
Costa, A. M., Ferreira, M. E., & da Silva Loureiro, M. J. (2021). Scientific literacy: The conceptual framework prevailing over the first decade of the twenty-first century. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 1(81), 195-228. DOI: 10.17227/rce.num81-10293
De Boer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. DOI: 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
De Vaus, D. (1997). Surveys in Social Research (H., Nayebee, Persian Trans.). Tehran: Nashre Ney [in Persian]
Eurobarometer (2021). European citizens’ knowledge and attitudes towards science and technology. Retrieved from https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2237
Farajpahlo, A. H., Azimi Vaziri, A., & Memar, S. (2023). Measering scientific literacy among Ahvazi citizens. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 21(2), 157-174. DOI: 10.22034/ijism.2023.1977795.0
Fricker, R. D. (2012). Sampling methods for web and E-mail surveys. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9780857020055.n11
Ghadimi, A. (2017). Research project compiling a package of science popularization programs in framework of National Scientific Comprehensive Plan. Popularization of Science, 8(1), 5-25. (Persian)
Ghadimi, A. et al (2021). Localization and measurement of indicators of public understanding of science and technology. Research Report. Iran University Press. (Persian)
Ghadimi, A. & Azadi, Gh (2023). Localization of indicators of public understanding of science and technology in Iran. Popularization of Science, 14(2), 8-35. (Persian) DOI: 10.22034/POPSCI.2024.454301.1325
Ghaneirad, M.A. (2015). Survey of science and society: A global experience and doing Iranian version. Tehran: Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. (Persian)
Ghaneirad, M. A., & Morshedi, A. (2011). Survey of public understanding of science and technology; pilot study in Tehran. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 4(1), 93-103. (Persian)
Hashemianfar, S. A., RabbaniKhorasgani, A., & Maher, Z. (2014). The study of the effect of social class on public understanding of science: A case of isfahan city citizens. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 125-154. (Persian) DOI: 10.22067/jss.v11i1.15414
Hoque, E. (2018). Memorization: A proven method of learning. International Journal of Applied Research, 22(3), 142-150.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407-416. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199806)82:3<407::aid-sce6>3.0.co;2-g
Institut Public de Sondage d'Opinion Secteur. (2022). Doctors and scientists are seen as the world’s most trustworthy professions. Retrieved from: https://www.ipsos.com/en/global-trustworthiness-index-2022
Irwin, A., & Michael, M. (2003). EBOOK: Science, social theory & public knowledge. New York: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Kawamoto, S., Nakayama, M., & Saijo, M. (2013). A survey of scientific literacy to provide a foundation for designing science communication in Japan. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 674-690. DOI: 10.1177/0963662511418893
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:13.0.CO;2-C
Liu, X. (2009). Beyond science Literacy: Science and the public. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 301-311.
Maher, Z & Madanian, S. (2014). Measuring public understanding of science: Isfahan Citizens [Paper presentation]. The first International Conference of Social Science and Sociology, Shiraz, Iran. (Persian)
Miller, J., & Pardo, R. (2003). Civic scientific literacy and attitude to science and technology: A comparative analysis of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. In M. Dierkes & C. von Grote (Eds.), Between Understanding and Trust. The Public, Science, and Technology (pp. 81-130). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Group.
Miller, J. D. (1992). Towards a scientific understanding of the public understanding of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 23-30. DOI: 10.1088/0963-6625/1/1/005
Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767-1778. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.0900041
Ojagh, S. Z., & Abdollahyan, H. (2013). A comparative analysis of the role of Iranian public science magazines in upgrading scientific knowledge of their audience. Cultural Studies and Communication, 9(31), 43-62. (Persian)
Ojagh, S. Z. (2021). Reflections on science communication and Iranian experience. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (Persian)
Ojagh, S. Z. (2021). Framing agricultural biotechnology in Iranian News Agencies between 2005 and 2017. New Media Studies, 7(26), 335-368. DOI: 10.22054/nms.2021.60646.1198 (Persian)
Putranta, H., & Supahar. (2019). Synthesis of the cognitive aspects’ science literacy and Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Chapter Momentum and Impulse. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1, 012014. IOP Publishing. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012014