فهم دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی از بومی شدن علوم اجتماعی:یک مطالعه پدیدارشناختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد جامعه شناسی، دانشگاه مازندران،بابلسر، ایران

2 دانشیار جامعه شناسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

3 استادیار جامعه شناسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

4 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مطالعات جوانان ،دانشگاه مازندران،بابلسر، ایران

چکیده

علوم اجتماعی ایران در طول تاریخ تکوین خود شاهد مناقشات فراوانی حول مسأله امکان یا امتناع بومی‌شدن بوده است. طی سالهای پس از انقلاب، سیاستگذاری‌های اعمال شده در این حوزه موجب شکل‌گیری صورتبندی‌های فکری پیچیده‌تری شده است. علی رغم اهمیت موضوع و با وجود ادبیات نظری بسنده‌ای که در این حوزه وجود دارد، تاکنون مطالعات تجربی اندکی حول فهم تجربه کنشگران علم انجام گرفته است. بدین ترتیب، مطالعه حاضر با هدف شناخت درک و فهم دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی از بومی شدن علوم اجتماعی در ایران و با بهره گیری از روش پدیدارشناسی تفسیری انجام گرفته است. مشارکت-کنندگان در این پژوهش، 31 نفر از دانشجویان ارشد و دکتری در رشته علوم‌اجتماعی دانشگاه مازندران بودند که از طریق نمونه‌گیری هدفمند انتخاب شدند. برای گردآوری داده‌ها از مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته و عمیق استفاده شد و جهت تحلیل داده‌ها فرآیند شش مرحله‌ای پیش بینی شده در روش IPA اعمال شد که خروجی آن، شناسایی ساختاری متشکل از 8 مضمون اصلی و 44 مضمون فرعی بود. در ادامه هر یک از مضامین اصلی که عبارت بودند از: سردرگمی معنایی، ناتوانی در بومی‌شدن علم، بی اعتمادی به بومی‌شدن علم، راهگشایی علم بومی، بومی شدن به مثابه امری ایدئولوژیک، درک سیاسی از بومی شدن علم، درک هویتی از بومی‌شدن علم، و الزامات و اقتضائات بومی شدن علم، بر اساس مضامین فرعی شکل‌دهنده‌شان توصیف شدند. نتایج حاصل از پژوهش در دو الگوی اصلی از فهم معنای بومی شدن علوم اجتماعی ارائه گردید: «الگویی از علوم اجتماعی بومی» که در آن دانشجویان علم بومی را به صورت یک نظام معرفتی ایدئولوژیک فهم می کنند و «الگویی برای علوم اجتماعی بومی» که علم بومی را به معنای استعمارزدایی از علم و اسلامی شدن علم درک می کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Postgraduate Students' Understanding of The Indigenization of Social Sciences: A Phenomenological Study

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nader Razeghi 1
  • Heydar Janalizadeh Choobbasti 2
  • Mohammadmahdi Farzbod 3
  • Behnaz Seifi 4
1 Professor of Sociology- Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences- University of Mazandaran- Babolsar
2 Associate Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
4 MA in Youth Study, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Throughout its history, Iranian social sciences have witnessed many controversies around the issue of indigenization. During the years after the revolution, the policies implemented in the science institution have formed more complex intellectual formulations than the duality of the possibility or refusal of indigenization of science, so that a significant theoretical literature has been formed around the plan and proposal to solve this issue. Despite the importance of such an issue, few empirical studies have been conducted so far on understanding the experience of science actors on the issue of indigenization of science. The present study aimed to identify the understanding and comprehension of postgraduate students on the issue of indigenization of social sciences in Iran and was conducted using the interpretive phenomenological method. The participants in this study were 31 master's and doctoral students in the field of social sciences at the University of Mazandaran, who were selected through purposive sampling. Semi-structured and in-depth interviews were used to collect data, and the six-step process predicted in the IPA method was applied to analyze the data, the output of which was the identification of a structure consisting of 8 main themes and 44 sub-themes. Each of the main themes, which were: semantic confusion, inability to indigenize science, distrust of indigenization of science, indigenous science as a guide, indigenization as an ideological matter, political understanding of indigenization of science, identity understanding of indigenization of science, and requirements of indigenization of science, were extracted based on their subcategories. The results of the research were identified in two main models of understanding the meaning of indigenization of social sciences: “a model of indigenous of social sciences” in which students understand indigenous science as an ideological epistemological system and “a model for indigenous social sciences” in which indigenous science is understood as the decolonization of science and the Islamization of science.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Indigenization of social sciences
  • Interpretive phenomenology
  • Islamic social sciences
  • Understanding of indigenization of science
  • postgraduate students

مراجع

Abah, J., Mashebe, P., & Denuga, D. D. (2015). Prospect of integrating African indigenous knowledge systems into the teaching of sciences in Africa. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 668-673. DOI: 10.12691/education-3-6-1
Alatas, S. F. (2006). A khaldunian exemplar for a historical sociology for the south. Current Sociology, 54(3), 397-411. DOI:10.1177/0011392106063189
AzadAramaki, T. (2006). Intellectualism in the transition of thoughts. Tehran: Culture and Education Research Institute Publications. (Persian)
Bala, A., Gheverghese Joseph, G. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and western science: The possibility of dialogue. Race & Class, 49(1), 39-61. DOI: 10.1177/0306396807080067
Barzegar, E. (2010). The humanities indigenization approach. Journal of Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (MSSH), 16(63), 29-53. (Persian)
Durkheim, E., & Lukes, S. (1982). The Rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method. In S. Lukes (Ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from: http://fssh.rjt.ac.lk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/The-Rules-of-Sociological-Method-PDFDrive-.pdf
Farasatkhah, M. (2009). Three cognitive paths to indigenous knowledge in Iran: A comparative study emphasizing conceptual, structural and functional shifts of the science. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 3(1 (5)), 97-110. (Persian)
Gabrenya, W. K., Kung, M. C., & Chen, L. Y. (2006). Understanding the Taiwan indigenous psychology movement: A sociology of science approach. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6), 597-622. DOI: 10.1177/0022022106290480
Geertz, C. (1973) the Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Ghaneirad, M. A., & Joukar, M. (2009). Autonomous/Alternative social sciences and multiple objectivity (A glance at Sayed Hussein and Saved Farid Alatas ideas). Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 3(1 (5)), 7-36. (Persian)
Javadi, A., & Towfiq, I. (2012). An epistemological reflection on academic sociology in Iran. Quarterly of Social Problems of Iran, 3(1), 59-83. (Persian)
Kazemi, A. (2022), The journey of theories, Tehran: Agar Publications. (Persian)
Kouthari, M. (2009). Possibility of production of Islamic Social Science. Strategy for Culture, 2(7), 31-54. (Persian)
Kumar, N. (2001). Indigenous social psychology of science for a developing society: An empirical justification. Psychology and Developing Societies, 13(2), 153-171. DOI: 10.1177/097133360101300203
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Malekian, M. (2007). Science without history, without geography. Reflection of Thought, 87, 281-287. (Persian)
Mansouri, R. (2022), The architecture of science in Iran. Tehran: Cultural and Social Studies Research Institute Publications. (Persian)
Mosavi, Y. (2021). Indigenous and universal sciences approach in Iran and the necessities of interaction between them. Sociological Review, 27(2), 61-79. (Persian) DOI: 10.22059/jsr.2021.81418
Panahi, M. H. (2015). Normal science and indigenization of social sciences. Strategy for Culture, 7(28), 29-59. (Persian)
Parsania, H., Mirsepah, A., & Panahi, M. H. (2009). Indigenization of Sociology. Ma`rifat Farhangi Ejtemaei, 1(1), 7-16. (Persian)
Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2014). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Psychological Journal, 20(1), 7-14. DOI: 10.14691/CPPJ.20.1.7
Quinn, A. L. (2022). Bridging indigenous and Western methods in social science research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 16094069221080301. DOI: 10.1177/16094069221080301
Saffar, A.S., & Ahmadnia, S. (2020). Strategic analysis of scientific production areas of development discourse in Iran with the emphasis an localization of the social sciences using swot matrix. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies, 12(1), 123-140. (Persian)
Schuerkens, U. (2003). The sociological and anthropological study of globalization and localization. Current Sociology, (51)3-4, 209-222. DOI: 10.1177/0011392103051003004
Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology & Health, 11(2), 261-271. DOI: 10.1080/08870449608400256
Smith, J.A. & Osborn, M. (2003) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (pp. 51-80). London: Sage Publications.
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London: Sage Publications. DOI: 10.1080/14780880903340091
Towfiq, I. (2011). Society in transition and postcolonial discourse: A reflection on the crisis of Social Sciences in Iran. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 12(1, 2), 3-39. (Persian)
Towfiq, I. (2017). About the knowledge system. Tehran: Research Institute for Cultural and Social Studies. (Persian)
Zaeri, Q., & Eskandari Naddaf, A. (2022). Analysis and evaluation of opinions of supporters and opponents of indigenous social science in Iran. Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, 12(3), 9-30. DOI: 10.22059/jstmt.2022.324150.1459

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار