مرور نظام‌مند و تحلیل علم‌سنجی پژوهش‌های علمی سیاست‌های علم، فناوری و نوآوری در حوزه انرژی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار مدیریت فناوری دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قم، قم، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت تکنولوژی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، تهران ، ایران.

چکیده

صنعت انرژی نقش حیاتی در تأمین نیازهای اساسی جوامع بشری ایفا می‌کند و به‌عنوان یکی از ارکان اصلی توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و زیست‌محیطی مطرح است. در دهه‌های اخیر، سیاستگذاری‌های انرژی به سمت توسعه فناوری‌های پایدار و کاهش انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای سوق یافته است. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، کاربردی است و با رویکرد علم‌سنجی و با استفاده از مرور نظام مند، نقشه‌های دانش ترسیم شده است. ابتدا واژگان کلیدی از طریق مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای شناسایی گردید و پس از مصاحبه‌های اکتشافی با خبرگان و متخصصان به روش هدفمند و با هدف رسیدن به اجماع نظری، روند گردآوری واژگان متوقف شد. پس از شناسایی واژگان، داده‌ها از طریق نرم‌افزار Publish or Perish استخراج شدند. تعداد داده های اولیه پژوهش‌های‌ علمی در زمینه سیاست های علم، فناوری و نوآوری در صنعت انرژی در پایگاه گوگل اسکولار طی سال‌های 2000 تا 2024 میلادی 38,984 رکورد می باشد. پس از حذف داده‌های تکراری و غیرمعتبر، تعداد رکوردها به 25,124 مورد کاهش یافت و این داده‌ها وارد نرم‌افزار VOSviewer شدند. بررسی رکوردهای یافت‌شده نشان داد که بیشترین استنادات در بازه زمانی 2000 تا 2024 میلادی مربوط به موضوعات زیر است: (1) سیاست زیست محیطی (2) ذخیره انرژی (3) سیستم‌های نوآوری انرژی (4) فناوری‌های نوظهور انرژی (5) اقتصاد انرژی (6) انتقال انرژی (7) استراتژی ملی انرژی (8) تحقیق و توسعه در انرژی (9) سیستم‌های نوآوری (10) انتقال فناوری (11) سیاست‌های مقایسه ای انرژی. همچنین یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که طی سال‌های اخیر، روند مطالعات در این حوزه‌ها نزولی بوده است. شایان ذکر است که بیشترین استنادات مربوط به سیاست‌های علم و فناوری و نوآوری در صنعت انرژی به «توسعه فناورانه» در سال‌های 2011 و 2012 اختصاص داشته و کمترین استنادات مربوط به «انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر» بوده است. نتایج این تحقیق به سیاست‌گذاران این امکان را می‌دهد تا روندهای پژوهشی اصلی در حوزه انرژی را شناسایی کرده و نواحی نوظهور را که نیازمند توجه و سرمایه‌گذاری بیشتر هستند، مشخص نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Systematic review and scientometric analysis of scientific researches of science, technology and innovation policies in the field of energy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Shirazi 1
  • Kaveh Alba 2
1 Assistant Professor of Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
2 PhD Candidate in Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The energy industry plays a vital role in meeting the basic needs of human societies and is considered one of the main pillars of economic, social, and environmental development. In recent decades, energy policies have been directed towards the development of sustainable technologies and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This research is practical in terms of purpose and knowledge maps have been drawn with a scientometric approach and using a systematic review. First, key words were identified through library studies, and after exploratory interviews with experts and specialists in a targeted manner and with the aim of reaching a theoretical consensus, the process of collecting words was stopped. After identifying the words, data were extracted through the Publish or Perish software. The number of primary data of scientific research in the field of science, technology, and innovation policies in the energy industry in the Google Scholar database during the years 2000 to 2024 is 38,984 records. After removing duplicate and invalid data, the number of records was reduced to 25,124 and these data were entered into the VOSviewer software. A review of the found records showed that the most citations in the period from 2000 to 2024 were related to the following topics: (1) Environmental policy (2) Energy storage (3) Energy innovation systems (4) Emerging energy technologies (5) Energy economics (6) Energy transfer (7) National energy strategy (8) Energy research and development (9) Innovation systems (10) Technology transfer (11) Comparative energy policies. The findings also show that in recent years, the trend of studies in these areas has been downward. It is worth noting that the most citations related to science and technology policies and innovation in the energy industry were allocated to “technological development” in 2011 and 2012, and the least citations were related to “renewable energies”. The results of this research will allow policymakers to identify key research trends in the energy field and identify emerging areas that require further attention and investment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Scientific research
  • systematic review
  • scientometric analysis
  • science
  • technology and innovation policies
  • energy industry
  • Google scholar
  • Vosviwer

مراجع

Abbasi, M., Razavi, S., & Karimi, N. (2021). Scientometric analysis of scientific productions in the field of solar power plants. Journal of Iranian Energy Research, 7(2), 25-40. (Persian) DOI: 10.29252/jcbr.2.4.23
Amoosi, F., Fazli, S., Arasti, Z., & Elahi, S. M. (2024). A Systematic Review and Scientometrics Analysis of Scientific Research in the Field of Green Entrepreneurship Development. Journal of Scientometrics Research, 10(19), 259-282. (Persian) DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2023.17194.1644
BP Oil Industry Company. (2021). Statistical review of world energy 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html
Carley, S., & Konisky, D. M. (2020). The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nature Energy, 5(8), 569-577. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-020-0641-6
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Chinnasamy, B., Yuvakkumar, R., Kumar, P. S., Ravi, G., Velauthapillai, D., Karaman, C., ... & Karimi-Maleh, H. (2022). Mapping and scientometric measures on research publications of energy storage and conversion. Topics in Catalysis, 65(5), 753-764. DOI: 10.1007/s11244-022-01597-3
Davarpanah, M.R. (2012). Scientometric analysis of nuclear science and technology research output in Iran. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 43(4), 421-439. DOI: 10.1353/scp.2012.0016.
De Filippo, D., Lascurain, M. L., Pandiella-Dominique, A., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2020). Scientometric analysis of research in energy efficiency and citizen science through projects and publications. Sustainability, 12(12), 5175. DOI: 10.3390/su12125175
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Ebrahimzadeh, F., Mahdizadeh Seraj, F., Norouzian Maleki, S., & Piri, S. (2023). Evaluation of scientific productions in the field of students' physical activity focusing on the physical characteristics of open spaces in elementary schools: A systematic review. Journal of Scientometrics Research, 9(2), 385-412. (Persian) DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2022.15591.1551
European Commission. (2021). Report from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the committee of the regions/ State of the Energy Union 2021 – Contributing to the European Green Deal and the Union’s recovery (pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action). Retrieved from: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-10/state_of_the_energy_union_report_2021.pdf
Fazeli Varzaneh, M., Bahmani, M., & Ghadari Azad, E. (2018). Iranian scientific outputs in the field of energy and fuel, and their comparison with those of the Middle East countries. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 5(1), 7-18. (Persian) DOI: 10.22088/cjs.5.1.7
Ghanadi Nejad, F., & Heydari, G. (2020). Methods and indicators for evaluating scientific productions in humanities and social sciences: A systematic review. Journal of Scientometrics Research, 6(2), 203-230. (Persian) DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2020.4998.1341
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2013). Opinion paper: Thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 96, 381-394.
International Energy Agency. (2009). World Energy Outlook 2009. Retrieved from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ac80b701-bdfc-48cf-ac4c-00e60e1246a0/weo2009.pdf
International Energy Agency. (2021). World Energy Outlook 2021. Retrieved from: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/4ed140c1-c3f3-4fd9-acae-789a4e14a23c/WorldEnergyOutlook2021.pdf
International Energy Agency. (2023). World energy outlook 2023. Retrieved from: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/86ede39e-4436-42d7-ba2a-edf61467e070/WorldEnergyOutlook2023.pdf
International Renewable Energy Agency. (2021). Renewable energy statistics 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2021/Aug/Renewable-Energy-Statistics-2021
IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Mitigation of climate change. Retrieved from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/ report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_FullVolume.pdf
IRENA. (2022). Renewable energy statistics 2022. International Renewable Energy Agency. Retrieved from: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2022/Jul/IRENA_Renewable_energy_statistics_2022.pdf
Lee, P. C., & Su, H. N. (2010). Investigating the structure of regional innovation system research Information Science. Innovation Organization & Management, 19(1), 71-85. DOI: 10.5172/impp.12.1.26
Lund, H. (2014). Renewable energy systems: A smart energy systems approach to the choice and modeling of 100% renewable solutions. Cambridge: Academic Press.
Moghaddam, N., Mousavi, S., Nasiri, M., Moallemi, E. A., & Yousefdehi, H. (2011). Wind energy status of Iran: Evaluating Iran's technological capability in manufacturing wind turbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), 4200-4211. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.029
Mosavizadeh, M., Norouzi Chakoli, A., & Pournaghi, R. (2022). Identification of analytical components in retrieval systems based on visualization techniques in scientometrics: A systematic review. Scientometrics Research Journal, 8(1), 191-216. (Persian) DOI: 10.22070/rsci.2020.5321.1367
National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2021). Annual technology baseline. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/80095.pdfhttps://atb.nrel.gov/
Nemet, G. F. (2009). Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy, 38(5), 700-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.004
OECD. (2023). OECD Economic Outlook. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-economic-outlook/volume-2023/issue-2_7a5f73ce-en/full-report.html
Pandiyan, P., Saravanan, S., Usha, K., Kannadasan, R., Alsharif, M. H., & Kim, M. K. (2023). Technological advancements toward smart energy management in smart cities. Energy Reports, 10, 648-677. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.021
Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. (2019). Renewables 2019; global status report. Retrieved from: https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2019_full_report_en.pdf
Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. (2021). Renewables 2021; Global Status Report. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. Retrieved from: https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GSR2021_Full_Report.pdf
Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century. (2023). Renewables global status report 2023. Available from: https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/GSR2023_GlobalOverview_Full_Report_with_endnotes_web.pdfhttps://www.ren21.net/?s=Renewables+global+status+report+2023
Siano, P. (2014). Demand response and smart grids-a survey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 30, 461-478. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.022
Sovacool, B. K. (2014). What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 1-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003
Sweet, M. and Moynihan, R. (2007). Improving population health: The uses of systematic review. New York: Millbank Memorial Fund.
U.S. Department of Energy. (2021). Office of energy efficiency and renewable energy. Retrieved from: https://www.energy.gov/eere/office-energy-efficiency-renewable-energy
UNFCCC. (2005). What is the Kyoto Protocol? Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol
UNFCCC. (2016). Paris agreement. What is the Paris agreement? Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf
UNFCCC. (2021). Paris agreement. What is the Paris agreement? Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
United Nations Environment Programme. (2022). Emissions gap report 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2022
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Measuring science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (pp. 19-50). Berlin: Springer. DOI:10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_2
World Energy Council. (2022). World Energy Trilemma Index 2022. Retrieved from: https://trilemma.worldenergy.org/reports/main/2022/World%20Energy%20Trilemma%20Index%202022.pdf

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار